FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  
e been noticed before, but it is easily understood, for as soon as the questioner gave the problem he bent forward--be it ever so slightly--in order to observe the horse's foot the more closely, for the foot was the horse's organ of speech. Hans would invariably begin to tap when I stooped to jot down some note I wished to make. Even to lower the head a little was sufficient to elicit a response, even though the body itself might remain completely erect. Of thirty tests made in this position, twenty-nine were successful. Hans would continue to tap until the questioner again resumed a completely erect posture. If, for instance, I stooped forward after having told the horse to tap 13, and if I purposely remained in this position until I had counted 20, he would, without any hesitation, tap 20. If I asked him to add 3 and 4, but did not move until 14 was reached, he would tap 14. Twenty-six such tests gave similar results. The reaction of the horse upon such a signal for stopping showed slight modifications according to the time which elapsed between the last tap and the signal for stopping. These modifications, which had hitherto been paraded as expressions of the horse's psychical power may be illustrated by the following schematic figures (Figures 1-4). In all of them the dotted line _c-d_ represents the ground level; _d_ shows where the horse's right forefoot was located before he began tapping; _a_ and _c_, respectively, indicate the place to which the foot is lowered during the process of tapping. The unbroken line gives the direction of the back-step. If Hans, having raised his foot from _a_ to _b_--preparatory to tapping,--receives the signal at or just before the moment he lowers the foot, he immediately swings it in a wide circle from _c_ back to its original position at _d_, (Fig. 1). As a matter of fact _a_ and _c_ coincide, but are juxtaposed in the diagram for the sake of schematic utility. This was the usual form of the back-step. [Illustration: FIG. 1.] If the signal for stopping is given a little after the last tap (Fig. 2), i. e., at the time that the foot is already being raised for another tap, then the back-step occurs as _a-b-d_. The horse thus gives, at the moment it receives the signal for stopping, a changed impulse to the moving foot. The curve, therefore, has a kink at _b_, and the back-step occurs with seeming hesitancy,--Hans appears not quite certain of his result. [Illustration: FI
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67  
68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
signal
 

stopping

 

tapping

 

position

 

raised

 
completely
 

receives

 

moment

 

stooped

 

modifications


forward

 

Illustration

 

schematic

 

occurs

 
questioner
 

represents

 

dotted

 
ground
 
lowered
 

located


process
 

direction

 
unbroken
 

forefoot

 

matter

 

changed

 

impulse

 

moving

 

result

 

appears


hesitancy

 
circle
 
original
 

swings

 

lowers

 

immediately

 

Figures

 

utility

 

coincide

 

juxtaposed


diagram

 

preparatory

 

results

 

sufficient

 
elicit
 

response

 

wished

 
twenty
 
thirty
 

remain