FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  
lours which history and poetic propriety require; but there is none of the complacency of the merely provincial habit of mind. The lines do not lack vigour; and there are passages of high merit, notably the oft-quoted section beginning "A! fredome is a noble thing." Despite a number of errors of fact, notably the confusion of the three Bruces in the person of the hero, the poem is historically trustworthy as compared with contemporary verse-chronicle, and especially with the _Wallace_ of the next century. No one [v.03 p.0390] has doubted Barbour's authorship of the _Brus_, but argument has been attempted to show that the text as we have it is an edited copy, perhaps by John Ramsay, a Perth scribe, who wrote out the two extant texts, preserved in the Advocates' library, Edinburgh, and in the library of St John's College, Cambridge. Extensive portions of the poem have been incorporated by Wyntoun (_q.v._) in his _Chronicle_. The first printed edition extant is Charteris's (Edinburgh, 1571); the second is Hart's (Edinburgh, 1616). (2) Wyntoun speaks (_Chronicle_ III. iii.) of a "Treteis" which Barbour made by way of "a genealogy" of "Brutus lynagis"; and elsewhere in that poem there are references to the archdeacon's "Stewartis Oryginale." This "Brut" is unknown; but the reference has been held by some to be to (3) a Troy-book, based on Guido da Colonna's _Historia Destructionis Troiae_. Two fragments of such a work have been preserved in texts of Lydgate's _Troy-book_, the first in MS. Camb. Univ. Lib. Kk. v. 30, the second in the same and in MS. Douce 148 in the Bodleian library, Oxford. This ascription was first made by Henry Bradshaw, the librarian of Cambridge University; but the consensus of critical opinion is now against it. Though it were proved that these Troy fragments are Barbour's, there remains the question whether their identification with the book on the Stewart line is justified. The scale of the story in these fragments forces us to doubt this identification. They contain 595 + 3118 = 3713 lines and are concerned entirely with "Trojan" matters. This would be an undue allowance in a Scottish "genealogy." (4) Yet another work was added to the list of Barbour's works by the discovery in the university library of Cambridge, by Henry Bradshaw, of a long Scots poem of over 33,000 lines, dealing with _Legends of the Saints_, as told in the _Legenda Aurea_ and other legendaries. The general likeness of this poe
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240  
241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Barbour

 

library

 
fragments
 

Cambridge

 

Edinburgh

 
extant
 

identification

 

preserved

 

Bradshaw

 

Wyntoun


genealogy

 

Chronicle

 
notably
 

matters

 
Lydgate
 
legendaries
 
Trojan
 

concerned

 

Legenda

 

allowance


likeness

 

Troiae

 
general
 

Scottish

 

Destructionis

 

Historia

 
Colonna
 

Bodleian

 

Oxford

 

question


reference

 

remains

 

Stewart

 

forces

 

justified

 

proved

 

University

 
consensus
 

critical

 

librarian


ascription

 

Saints

 
discovery
 
Though
 

dealing

 

Legends

 

opinion

 
university
 

confusion

 

Bruces