FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  
mother, it must be starved? The struggle by the sole action of which such a form was developed must indeed have been severe! [Illustration: AN ECHINUS, OR SEA-URCHIN (The spines removed from one-half.)] The sea-urchins (Echinus) present us also with structures the origin of which it seems impossible to explain by the action of "Natural {44} Selection" only. These lowly animals belong to that group of the star-fish class (Echinodermata), the species of which possess generally spheroidal bodies, built up of multitudinous calcareous plates, and constitute the order Echinoidea. They are also popularly known as sea-eggs. Utterly devoid of limbs, the locomotion of these creatures is effected by means of rows of small tubular suckers (which protrude through pores in the calcareous plates) and by moveable spines scattered over the body. [Illustration: PEDICELLARIAE. (Immensely enlarged.)] Besides these spines and suckers there are certain very peculiar structures, termed "Pedicellariae." Each of these consists of a long slender stalk, ending in three short limbs--or rather jaws--the whole supported by a delicate internal skeleton. The three limbs (or jaws), which start from a common point at the end of the stalk, are in the constant habit of opening and closing together again with a snapping action, while the stalk itself sways about. The utility of these appendages is, even now, problematical. It may be that they remove from the surface of the animal's body foreign substances which would be prejudicial to it, and which it cannot otherwise get rid of. But granting this, what would be the utility of the _first rudimentary beginnings_ of such structures, and how could such incipient buddings have ever preserved the life of a single Echinus? It is true that on Darwinian principles the ancestral form from which the sea-urchin developed was different, and must not be conceived merely as an Echinus devoid of pedicellariae; but this makes the difficulty none the less. It is equally hard to imagine that the first rudiments of such structures could have been useful to _any_ animal from which the Echinus might have been{45} derived. Moreover, not even the _sudden_ development of the snapping action could have been beneficial without the freely moveable stalk, nor could the latter have been efficient without the snapping jaws, yet no minute merely indefinite variations could simultaneously evolve these complex co-ordination
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61  
62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Echinus
 

structures

 
action
 

snapping

 
spines
 
suckers
 
moveable
 

calcareous

 

animal

 

plates


utility

 

devoid

 

Illustration

 

developed

 

rudimentary

 

granting

 

opening

 

beginnings

 

problematical

 

appendages


prejudicial

 

closing

 

substances

 

remove

 
surface
 
foreign
 

development

 

sudden

 

beneficial

 

freely


Moreover

 
derived
 
efficient
 

evolve

 

complex

 

ordination

 

simultaneously

 

variations

 

minute

 
indefinite

rudiments
 
imagine
 

Darwinian

 

principles

 
ancestral
 

single

 

buddings

 

preserved

 

urchin

 
equally