FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   >>  
e of arms, attempt anything; that then the ... King of Great Britain ... shall first of all, by his interposition, perform all the offices of a friend and princely ally, which may serve towards the keeping inviolable all the frequently mentioned agreements, and of every article comprehended in them, and consequently towards the preservation of peace between both kings; that afterwards if the King, who is the beginner of such prejudice, or any molestation or injury, contrary to all agreements, and contrary to any articles comprehended in them, shall refuse after being admonished ... then the King of Great Britain ... shall ... assist him that is injured as by the present agreements between the Kings of Great Britain and Sweden in such cases is determined and agreed. "_Query._ Does not this article expressly tell us how to remedy the disturbances our trade in the Baltic might suffer, in case of a misunderstanding betwixt the Kings of Sweden and Denmark, by obliging both these Princes to keep all the Treaties of Peace that have been concluded between them from 1660-1670, and in case either of them should in an hostile manner act against the said Treaties, by assisting the other against the aggressor? How comes it then that we don't make use of so just a remedy against an evil we are so great sufferers by? Can anybody, though ever so partial, deny but the King of Denmark, though seemingly a sincere friend to the King of Sweden, from the peace of Travendahl till he went out of Saxony against the Muscovites, fell very unjustly upon him immediately after, taking ungenerously advantage of the fatal battle of Pultava? Is not then the King of Denmark the violator of all the above-mentioned Treaties, and consequently the true author of the disturbances our trade meets with in the Baltic? Why in God's name don't we, according to this article, assist Sweden against him, and why do we, on the contrary, declare openly against the injured King of Sweden, send hectoring and threatening memorials to him, upon the least advantage he has over his enemies, as we did last summer upon his entering Norway, and even order our fleets to act openly against him in conjunction with the Danes? "_Article XIX._ There shall be 'stricter confederacy and union between the above-mentioned Kings of Great Britain and Sweden, for the future, _for the defence and preservation of the Protestant, Evangelic, and reformed religion_.' "_Query I._ How do we,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   >>  



Top keywords:

Sweden

 

Britain

 
Denmark
 

Treaties

 

mentioned

 

agreements

 

contrary

 

article

 

assist

 

openly


remedy
 

advantage

 

Baltic

 

disturbances

 

injured

 

comprehended

 

preservation

 

friend

 

unjustly

 

battle


Pultava

 

immediately

 

ungenerously

 

confederacy

 

taking

 

stricter

 

Travendahl

 

religion

 

sincere

 
seemingly

reformed

 
defence
 

Muscovites

 

Protestant

 

Evangelic

 

Saxony

 

future

 

hectoring

 

threatening

 

entering


Norway

 

memorials

 

summer

 

enemies

 

partial

 

fleets

 

declare

 
Article
 

author

 

conjunction