FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  
and with a design to elucidate such characters, I shall take the liberty to propose to the public the following queries: 1. Was not General R----d, in December, 1776, (then A----t G----l of the Continental army,) sent by General Washington to the commanding officer at Bristol, with orders relative to a general attack intended to be made on the enemy's post at Trenton, and those below, on the 25th, at night? 2. Two or three days before the intended attack, did not General R----d say, in conversation with the said commanding officer at his quarters, that our affairs looked very desperate, and that we were only making a sacrifice of ourselves? 3. Did he not also say, that the time of General Howe's proclamation, offering pardon and protection to persons who should come in before the 1st of January, 1777, was nearly expired, and that Galloway, the Allens, and others, had gone over, and availed themselves of the pardon and protection offered by the said proclamation? 4. Did not he, General R----d, at the same time say, that he had a family, and ought to take care of them; and that he did not understand following the wretched remains of a broken army? 5. Did he not likewise say to the said commanding officer, that his brother, (then a colonel or lieutenant-colonel of militia,) was at Burlington with his family, and that he had advised him to remain there, and if the enemy took possession of the town, to take a protection and swear allegiance? It is well for America, that very few general officers have reasoned in this manner; if they had, General Howe would have made an easy conquest of the United States. And it is very obvious, that officers of high rank, with such sentiments, can have no just pretensions to patriotism or public virtue, and can by no means be worthy of any post of honour or place of trust, where the liberties and interest of the people are immediately concerned. BRUTUS. _Philadelphia, September 3, 1782._ TO GENERAL JOSEPH REED. In the first part of your late publication, which is no less an invective against me, than it is a defence of yourself, you have, with sufficient art, insisted on my remarkably contentious, factious,[D] and jealous spirit, which suffers no man, und
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35  
36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
General
 

officer

 

commanding

 

protection

 

intended

 
proclamation
 
colonel
 

attack

 

public

 

officers


pardon

 
general
 

family

 

virtue

 

pretensions

 

worthy

 

patriotism

 

honour

 

allegiance

 

manner


obvious
 

United

 

reasoned

 
America
 
States
 
conquest
 
sentiments
 

sufficient

 

defence

 

invective


insisted

 
spirit
 

suffers

 

jealous

 

remarkably

 
contentious
 

factious

 

publication

 

immediately

 
concerned

BRUTUS

 

people

 

interest

 
liberties
 

Philadelphia

 

September

 

JOSEPH

 

possession

 

GENERAL

 
relative