FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   1605   1606   1607   1608   1609   1610   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623  
1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   >>   >|  
ind, in consideration of any vote or votes, by which his return to that house had been promoted or served. The bill passed the commons; but when it came to the lords its postponement for six months was moved by Lord Wynford, and the lord chancellor agreeing with him as to the impossibility of carrying its provisions into effect, the bill was thrown out. During the discussion on the reform question, one strong objection against the destruction of nomination-boroughs had been, that without them there would be no certain means of members who vacated their seats by accepting office of securing a new return. In order to obviate this inconvenience, the Marquis of Northampton brought in a bill to repeal, in so far as certain offices were concerned, the act of Queen Anne, by which an acceptance of any of them vacated a member's seat. On the motion for the second reading of this bill, the Duke of Wellington said there could be no doubt that some measure of this description was necessary; but it appeared to him that the present bill was only a half measure, because it provided for only half of the inconvenience likely to result. He also objected to the bill being brought forward in the individual capacity of the noble marquis. As the inconvenience would arise from a government measure, government should introduce a remedy, and recommend it to both houses of parliament upon their own responsibility. The lord-chancellor likewise thought that the second reading should be delayed till the matter had been more ripely considered. The second reading, therefore, was postponed, and, as the end of the session approached, the bill was ultimately laid aside. The last subject of direct reform in the representation was introduced by Mr. Bulwer, who moved an address to the king, praying that his majesty would give the free inhabitants of New South Wales a representative system. He grounded their title to it on the score both of population and taxation; but while ministers admitted that New South Wales must in time have a representative body, they did not think the elements had yet been formed out of which a safe constituency could be created, and the motion was negatived. COMMITTEES ON IRISH TITHES. {WILLIAM IV. 1832--1833} In the speech from the throne, on the opening of parliament, there was this clause:--"In parts of Ireland a systematic opposition has been made to the payment of tithes, attended in some instances with afflicti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1599   1600   1601   1602   1603   1604   1605   1606   1607   1608   1609   1610   1611   1612   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623  
1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
reading
 

inconvenience

 

measure

 

parliament

 
representative
 

reform

 
vacated
 

brought

 
motion
 
government

return

 

chancellor

 

address

 

introduced

 

Bulwer

 
representation
 
system
 

grounded

 

consideration

 
majesty

direct

 

inhabitants

 

praying

 

matter

 

ripely

 

delayed

 

thought

 

responsibility

 
likewise
 
considered

ultimately

 
approached
 

postponed

 

session

 

subject

 

speech

 

throne

 
opening
 

clause

 
TITHES

WILLIAM

 

Ireland

 

tithes

 
attended
 
instances
 

afflicti

 

payment

 

systematic

 

opposition

 

admitted