FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
The perfect order which prevails among members is another marked feature during the debates. The bewigged and berobed Speaker, seated in his imposing high-backed chair, seems rather to be retained in his place out of due deference to time-honored custom than because a presiding officer is necessary to preserve proper decorum. To be sure, demonstrations of applause at a good bit, or of discontent with a prosy speaker, are common, but anything approaching disorder is of rare occurrence. The adherence to forms and precedents is not a little amusing. Take, for example, a "division," which corresponds to a call for the Ayes and Noes with us. To select an instance at random,--there happens this evening to be a good deal of excitement about some documents which it is alleged the Ministry dare not produce; so the minority, who oppose the bill under debate, make a great show of demanding the papers, and, not being gratified, move to adjourn the debate, with the design of postponing the passage of the obnoxious measure. "I move that the debate be adjourned." "Who seconds?" "I do." "Those in the affirmative," etc., etc. Feeble "Aye." Most emphatic "No." "The noes have it." "No!" "No!" "Aye!" "Aye!" "Divide!" "Divide!" in a perfect Babel of orderly confusion. (Speaker, very solemnly and decidedly,)-- "Strangers must withdraw!" Is the gallery immediately cleared? Not a bit of it. Every man retains his place. Some even seem, to my fancy, to look a sort of grim defiance at the Speaker, as a bold Briton should. It is simply a form, which many years ago had some meaning, and, having once been used, cannot be discontinued without putting the Constitution in jeopardy. Five times this evening, the minority, intent on postponing the debate, call for a division,--and as many times are strangers gravely admonished to withdraw. There are two modes of adjourning the House,--by vote of the members, and by want of a quorum. The method of procedure in the latter case is somewhat peculiar, and has, of course, the sanction of many generations. Suppose that a dull debate on an unimportant measure, numerous dinner-parties, a fashionable opera, and other causes, have combined to reduce the number of members in attendance to a dozen. It certainly is not difficult to decide at a glance that a quorum (forty) is not present, and I presume you are every instant expecting, in your innocence, to hear, "Mr. Speaker, I move,"
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

debate

 

Speaker

 

members

 

withdraw

 
minority
 

Divide

 

quorum

 

evening

 

division

 

perfect


measure

 

postponing

 

gallery

 
Strangers
 
decidedly
 
immediately
 

cleared

 

discontinued

 

retains

 

meaning


Briton

 

simply

 

defiance

 
number
 

reduce

 

attendance

 
combined
 
parties
 

dinner

 
fashionable

difficult
 

decide

 
expecting
 

innocence

 
instant
 

glance

 

present

 
presume
 

numerous

 

unimportant


solemnly

 
adjourning
 

admonished

 

gravely

 
jeopardy
 

Constitution

 

intent

 

strangers

 
sanction
 

generations