FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038  
1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   >>   >|  
halepotaton Apasi d' argalea 'stin, ouk emoi mono, Tio polu mallon thugatri.--pragm' amachon legeis' Eu oida-- In the Latin edition of Caecilius, this conversation, so elegant in its simplicity, is converted into the following uncouth dialogue:-- -Sed tua morosane uxor quaeso est?--Ua! rogas?-- Qui tandem?--Taedet rientionis, quae mihi Ubi domum adveni ac sedi, extemplo savium Dat jejuna anima.--Nil peccat de savio: Ut devomas volt, quod foris polaveris.- 26. Even when the Romans built stone theatres, these had not the sounding-apparatus by which the Greek architects supported the efforts of the actors (Vitruv. v. 5, 8). 27. III. XIII. Increase of Amusements 28. The personal notices of Naevius are sadly confused. Seeing that he fought in the first Punic war, he cannot have been born later than 495. Dramas, probably the first, were exhibited by him in 519 (Gell. xii. 21. 45). That he had died as early as 550, as is usually stated, was doubted by Varro (ap. Cic. Brut. 15, 60), and certainly with reason; if it were true, he must have made his escape during the Hannibalic war to the soil of the enemy. The sarcastic verses on Scipio (p. 150) cannot have been written before the battle of Zama. We may place his life between 490 and 560, so that he was a contemporary of the two Scipios who fell in 543 (Cic. de Rep. iv. 10), ten years younger than Andronicus, and perhaps ten years older than Plautus. His Campanian origin is indicated by Gellius, and his Latin nationality, if proof of it were needed, by himself in his epitaph. The hypothesis that he was not a Roman citizen, but possibly a burgess of Cales or of some other Latin town in Campania, renders the fact that the Roman police treated him so unscrupulously the more easy of explanation. At any rate he was not an actor, for he served in the army. 29. Compare, e. g., with the verse of Livius the fragment from Naevius' tragedy of -Lycurgus- :-- -Vos, qui regalis cordons custodias Agitatis, ite actutum in frundiferos locos, Ingenio arbusta ubi nata sunt, non obsita-; Or the famous words, which in the -Hector Profisciscens- Hector addresses to Priam: -Laetus sum laudari me abs te, pater, a laudato viro;- and the charming verse from the -Tarentilla-; -- -Alii adnutat, alii adnictat; alium amat, alium tenet.- 30. III. XIV. Political Neutrality 31. III. XIV. Political Neutrality 32. This hypothesis appears necessary, because otherwis
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1014   1015   1016   1017   1018   1019   1020   1021   1022   1023   1024   1025   1026   1027   1028   1029   1030   1031   1032   1033   1034   1035   1036   1037   1038  
1039   1040   1041   1042   1043   1044   1045   1046   1047   1048   1049   1050   1051   1052   1053   1054   1055   1056   1057   1058   1059   1060   1061   1062   1063   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hector

 

Naevius

 

hypothesis

 
Political
 

Neutrality

 

epitaph

 

needed

 

burgess

 

battle

 
possibly

written

 
citizen
 
younger
 

Andronicus

 
Scipios
 

Plautus

 

nationality

 

Gellius

 
origin
 
contemporary

Campanian

 
explanation
 

Laetus

 

laudari

 
addresses
 

Profisciscens

 

obsita

 
famous
 

laudato

 

appears


otherwis

 

Tarentilla

 

charming

 

adnutat

 

adnictat

 

arbusta

 

served

 

Scipio

 

police

 

renders


treated

 

unscrupulously

 
Compare
 

Agitatis

 

custodias

 

actutum

 

frundiferos

 
Ingenio
 

cordons

 

regalis