FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493  
494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   >>   >|  
assert that Alexander the Great (431) and Demetrius Poliorcetes (471) lodged complaints at Rome regarding Antiate pirates. The former statement is of the same stamp, and perhaps from the same source, with that regarding the Roman embassy to Babylon (II. VII. Relations Between The East and West). It seems more likely that Demetrius Poliorcetes may have tried by edict to put down piracy in the Tyrrhene sea which he had never set eyes upon, and it is not at all inconceivable that the Antiates may have even as Roman citizens, in defiance of the prohibition, continued for a time their old trade in an underhand fashion: much dependence must not however, be placed even on the second story. 20. II. VI. Last Campaigns in Samnium 21. II. VII. Decline of the Roman Naval Power 22. According to Servius (in Aen. iv. 628) it was stipulated in the Romano-Carthaginian treaties, that no Roman should set foot on (or rather occupy) Carthaginian, and no Carthaginian on Roman, soil, but Corsica was to remain in a neutral position between them (-ut neque Romani ad litora Carthaginiensium accederent neque Carthaginienses ad litora Romanorum.....Corsica esset media inter Romanos et Carthaginienses-). This appears to refer to our present period, and the colonization of Corsica seems to have been prevented by this very treaty. 23. II. VII. Submission of Lower Italy 24. The clause, by which a dependent people binds itself "to uphold in a friendly manner the sovereignty of that of Rome" (-maiestatem populi Romani comiter conservare-), is certainly the technical appellation of that mildest form of subjection, but it probably did not come into use till a considerably later period (Cic. pro Balbo, 16, 35). The appellation of clientship derived from private law, aptly as in its very indefiniteness it denotes the relation (Dig. xlix. 15, 7, i), was scarcely applied to it officially in earlier times. 25. II. IV. South Etruria Roman 26. II. VI. Consolidation of the Roman Rule in Central Italy 27. II. VI. Last Struggles of Samnium 28. II. V. Complete Submission of the Volscian and Campanian Provinces 29. II. V. Complete Submission of the Volscian and Campanian Provinces 30. That Tusculum as it was the first to obtain passive burgess-rights (II. V. Crises within the Romano-Latin League) was also the first to exchange these for the rights of full burgesses, is probable in itself and presumably it is in the latter and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493  
494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Carthaginian
 

Corsica

 

Submission

 

Complete

 

appellation

 
Demetrius
 
Poliorcetes
 

Romano

 

Volscian

 
Samnium

period

 

Campanian

 
Carthaginienses
 

rights

 

Romani

 
litora
 

Provinces

 
prevented
 

subjection

 
considerably

uphold

 

friendly

 

dependent

 
people
 
clause
 

manner

 

sovereignty

 
conservare
 
technical
 

treaty


comiter

 
maiestatem
 

populi

 

mildest

 
Tusculum
 

obtain

 

passive

 

Consolidation

 

Central

 
Struggles

burgess

 
Crises
 

burgesses

 

probable

 

exchange

 

League

 

Etruria

 

indefiniteness

 

denotes

 
relation