FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792  
793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   >>   >|  
visibly increased, as to become matter of increased sport to such as were ignorant of its cause; and a proposition made at one of the dinners, when he was absent, to write a series of epitaphs upon him (his "country dialect" and his awkward person) was agreed to, and put in practice by several of the guests. The active aggressors appear to have been Garrick, Doctor Bernard, Richard Burke, and Caleb Whitefoord. Cumberland says he, too, wrote an epitaph; but it was complimentary and grave, and hence the grateful return he received. Mr. Forster considers Garrick's epitaph to indicate the tone of all. This, with the rest, was read to Goldsmith when he next appeared at the St. James's Coffee-house, where Cumberland, however, says he never again met his friends. But "the Doctor was called on for Retaliation," says the friend who published the poem with that name, "and at their next meeting produced the following, which I think adds one leaf to his immortal wreath." "'Retaliation'", says Sir Walter Scott, "had the effect of placing the author on a more equal footing with his Society than he had ever before assumed." Cumberland's account differs from the version formerly received, which intimates that the epitaphs were written before Goldsmith arrived: whereas the pun, "the late Dr. Goldsmith" appears to have suggested the writing of the epitaphs. In the "Retaliation", Goldsmith has not spared the characters and failings of his associates, but has drawn them with satire, at once pungent and good-humoured. Garrick is smartly chastised; Burke, the Dinner-bell of the House of Commons, is not let off; and of all the more distinguished names of the Club, Thomson, Cumberland, and Reynolds alone escape the lash of the satirist. The former is not mentioned, and the two latter are even dismissed with unqualified and affectionate applause. Still we quote Cumberland's account of the "Retaliation" which is very amusing from the closely circumstantial manner in which the incidents are narrated, although they have so little relationship to truth: "It was upon a proposal started by Edmund Burke, that a party of friends who had dined together at Sir Joshua Reynolds's and my house, should meet at the St. James's Coffee-house, which accordingly took place, and was
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   768   769   770   771   772   773   774   775   776   777   778   779   780   781   782   783   784   785   786   787   788   789   790   791   792  
793   794   795   796   797   798   799   800   801   802   803   804   805   806   807   808   809   810   811   812   813   814   815   816   817   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cumberland

 

Retaliation

 
Goldsmith
 

epitaphs

 

Garrick

 
friends
 

Doctor

 

received

 
Coffee
 

account


Reynolds

 

increased

 

epitaph

 

Commons

 
chastised
 

smartly

 

Dinner

 

failings

 

appears

 

arrived


version

 

intimates

 

written

 

suggested

 

writing

 

satire

 

pungent

 

spared

 

characters

 
associates

humoured

 

relationship

 

proposal

 
incidents
 
narrated
 
started
 

Edmund

 

Joshua

 
manner
 

circumstantial


satirist

 
mentioned
 
escape
 
distinguished
 

Thomson

 

amusing

 
closely
 

dismissed

 

unqualified

 

affectionate