FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  
sest ingratitude for the services we rendered them in enlightening them about the originality of Mr. Longfellow. When we accepted, therefore, an invitation to 'deliver' a poem in Boston, we accepted it simply and solely, because we had a curiosity to know how it felt to be publicly hissed--and because we wished to see what effect we could produce by a neat little _impromptu_ speech in reply. Perhaps, however, we overrated our own importance, or the Bostonian want of common civility--which is not quite so manifest as one or two of their editors would wish the public to believe. We assure Major Noah that he is wrong. The Bostonians are well-bred--as _very_ dull persons very generally are. Still, with their vile ingratitude staring us in the eyes, it could scarcely be supposed that we would put ourselves to the trouble of composing for the Bostonians anything in the shape of an _original_ poem. We did not. We had a poem, of about 500 lines, lying by us--one quite as good as new--one, at all events, that we considered would answer sufficiently well for an audience of Transcendentalists. _That_ we gave them--it was the best that we had--for the price--and it _did_ answer remarkably well. Its name was _not_ 'The Messenger-Star'--who but Miss Walter would ever think of so delicious a little bit of invention as that? We had no name for it at all. The poem is what is occasionally called a 'juvenile poem,' but the fact is it is anything but juvenile now, for we wrote it, printed it, and published it, in book form, before we had completed our tenth year. We read it _verbatim_, from a copy now in our possession, and which we shall be happy to show at any moment to any of our inquisitive friends. We do not, ourselves, think the poem a remarkably good one: it is not sufficiently transcendental. Still it did well enough for the Boston audience--who evinced characteristic discrimination in understanding, and especially applauding all those knotty passages which we ourselves have not yet been able to understand. "As regards the auger of _The Boston Times_, and one or two other absurdities--as regards, we say the wrath of Achilles--we incurred it-or rather its manifestation--by letting some of our cat out of the bag a few hours sooner than we had intended. Over a bottle of champagne, that night, we confessed to Messrs. Cushing, Whipple, Hudson, Fields, and a few other natives who swear not altogether by the frog-pond-we confessed, we sa
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89  
90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Boston

 
sufficiently
 
answer
 

audience

 

ingratitude

 

accepted

 

juvenile

 

confessed

 
remarkably
 

Bostonians


characteristic
 
transcendental
 

evinced

 

friends

 

moment

 

inquisitive

 

published

 
printed
 

called

 

completed


possession

 
discrimination
 
verbatim
 

sooner

 

manifestation

 

letting

 
intended
 

Fields

 

Hudson

 

Messrs


Cushing

 

natives

 

bottle

 

champagne

 

incurred

 

altogether

 

Whipple

 

passages

 
applauding
 

knotty


understand

 

absurdities

 

Achilles

 
occasionally
 
understanding
 
Perhaps
 

overrated

 

speech

 

impromptu

 

effect