FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  
_Everybody_ said _they_ thought it was the newest thing there.--WENDELL PHILLIPS. Struggling for life, _each_ almost bursting _their_ sinews to force the other off.--PAULDING. _Whosoever_ hath any gold, let _them_ break it off.--_Bible._ _Nobody_ knows what it is to lose a friend, till _they_ have lost him.--FIELDING. Where she was gone, or what was become of her, _no one_ could take upon _them_ to say.--SHERIDAN. I do not mean that I think _any one_ to blame for taking due care of _their_ health.--ADDISON. Exercise.--In the above sentences, _unless both genders are implied_, change the pronoun to agree with its antecedent. RELATIVE PRONOUNS. I. RESTRICTIVE AND UNRESTRICTIVE RELATIVES. [Sidenote: _What these terms mean._] 412. As to their conjunctive use, the definite relatives who, which, and that may be cooerdinating or restrictive. A relative, when cooerdinating, or unrestrictive, is equivalent to a conjunction (_and_, _but_, _because_, etc.) and a personal pronoun. It adds a new statement to what precedes, that being considered already clear; as, "I gave it to the beggar, _who_ went away." This means, "I gave it to the beggar [we know which one], _and he_ went away." A relative, when restrictive, introduces a clause to limit and make clear some preceding word. The clause is restricted to the antecedent, and does not add a new statement; it merely couples a thought necessary to define the antecedent: as, "I gave it to a beggar _who_ stood at the gate." It defines _beggar_. 413. It is sometimes contended that who and which should always be cooerdinating, and that always restrictive; but, according to the practice of every modern writer, the usage must be stated as follows:-- [Sidenote: _A loose rule the only one to be formulated._] Who and which are either cooerdinating or restrictive, the taste of the writer and regard for euphony being the guide. That is in most cases restrictive, the cooerdinating use not being often found among careful writers. Exercise. In the following examples, tell whether _who_, _which_, and _that_ are restrictive or not, in each instance:-- [Sidenote: Who.] 1. "Here he is now!" cried those who stood near Ernest.--HAWTHORNE. 2. He could overhear the remarks of various individuals, who were comparing the features with the face on the mountain side.--_Id._
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204  
205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
restrictive
 

cooerdinating

 
beggar
 

antecedent

 
Sidenote
 

pronoun

 

Exercise

 
writer
 

thought

 

clause


statement
 

relative

 

HAWTHORNE

 

restricted

 

Ernest

 
define
 

couples

 
overhear
 
remarks
 

features


mountain

 

comparing

 

introduces

 

individuals

 

preceding

 

formulated

 

examples

 

writers

 

careful

 

regard


euphony
 

contended

 

defines

 
practice
 

stated

 

instance

 

modern

 

conjunction

 
FIELDING
 
newest

SHERIDAN

 

friend

 
PAULDING
 

Whosoever

 

Struggling

 

sinews

 

bursting

 

PHILLIPS

 

WENDELL

 

Nobody