FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  
is the fittest object of scorn, you or _me_. [Sidenote: Me _in exclamations_.] 403. It is to be remembered that the objective form is used in exclamations which turn the attention upon a person; as,-- Unhappy _me!_ That I cannot risk my own worthless life.--KINGSLEY Alas! miserable _me_! Alas! unhappy Senors!--_Id._ Ay _me_! I fondly dream--had ye been there.--MILTON. [Sidenote: Nominative for the objective.] 404. The rule for the objective form is wrongly departed from-- (1) When the object is far removed from the verb, verbal, or preposition which governs it; as, "_He_ that can doubt whether he be anything or no, I speak not to" (_he_ should be _him_, the object of _to_); "I saw men very like him at each of the places mentioned, but not _he_" (_he_ should be _him_, object of _saw_). (2) In the case of certain pairs of pronouns, used after verbs, verbals, and prepositions, as this from Shakespeare, "All debts are cleared between you and I" (for _you_ and _me_); or this, "Let _thou_ and _I_ the battle try" (for _thee_ and _me_, or _us_). (3) By forgetting the construction, in the case of words used in apposition with the object; as, "Ask the murderer, _he_ who has steeped his hands in the blood of another" (instead of "_him_ who," the word being in apposition with _murderer_). [Sidenote: _Exception 1_, who _interrogative_.] 405. The interrogative pronoun who may be said to have no objective form in spoken English. We regularly say, "_Who_ did you see?" or, "_Who_ were they talking to?" etc. The more formal "To _whom_ were they talking?" sounds stilted in conversation, and is usually avoided. In literary English the objective form _whom_ is _preferred_ for objective use; as,-- Knows he now to _whom_ he lies under obligation?--SCOTT. What doth she look on? _Whom_ doth she behold?--WORDSWORTH. Yet the nominative form is found quite frequently to divide the work of the objective use; for example,-- My son is going to be married to I don't know _who_.--GOLDSMITH. _Who_ have we here?--_Id._ _Who_ should I meet the other day but my old friend.--STEELE. He hath given away half his fortune to the Lord knows _who_.--KINGSLEY. _Who_ have we got here?--SMOLLETT. _Who_ should we find there but Eustache?--MARRVAT. _Who_ the devil is he talking to?--SHERIDAN. [Sidenote: _Exception 2, but_ he, _etc._] 406.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199  
200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
objective
 

object

 

Sidenote

 

talking

 

Exception

 

murderer

 
interrogative
 
exclamations
 

apposition

 
KINGSLEY

English

 

preferred

 
literary
 

regularly

 

spoken

 

pronoun

 

stilted

 

conversation

 
sounds
 
formal

avoided

 

STEELE

 
friend
 
fortune
 

MARRVAT

 

SHERIDAN

 

Eustache

 
SMOLLETT
 

GOLDSMITH

 

WORDSWORTH


nominative

 

behold

 

frequently

 

married

 
divide
 

obligation

 
MILTON
 

Nominative

 
fondly
 

wrongly


verbal

 

preposition

 

governs

 
removed
 

departed

 

Senors

 

unhappy

 

remembered

 

attention

 
fittest