FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  
deration of this treaty. Mr. BULLITT. It is no secret that Mr. Lansing, Gen. Bliss, and Mr. Henry White objected very vigorously to the numerous provisions of the treaty. The CHAIRMAN. It is known that they objected to Shantung. That, I think, is public information. I do not know that it is public information that they objected to anything else. Mr. BULLITT. I do not think that Secretary Lansing is at all enthusiastic about the league of nations as it stands at present. I have a note of a conversation with him on the subject, which, if I may, I will just read, without going into the rest of that conversation, because it bears directly on the issue involved. This was a conversation with the Secretary of State at 2.30 on May 19. The Secretary sent for me. It was a long conversation, and Mr. Lansing in the course of it said: Mr. Lansing then said that he personally would have strengthened greatly the judicial clauses of the league of nations covenant, making arbitration compulsory. He also said that he was absolutely opposed to the United States taking a mandate in either Armenia or Constantinople; that he thought that Constantinople should be placed under a local government, the chief members of which were appointed by an international committee. This is a matter, it seems to me, of some importance in regard to the whole discussion, and therefore I feel at liberty to read it, as it is not a personal matter. The CHAIRMAN. This is a note of the conversation made at the time? Mr. BULLITT. This is a note which I immediately dictated after the conversation. [Reading:] Mr. Lansing then said that he, too, considered many parts of the treaty thoroughly bad, particularly those dealing with Shantung and the league of nations. He said: "I consider that the league of nations at present is entirely useless. The great powers have simply gone ahead and arranged the world to suit themselves. England and France in particular have gotten out of the treaty everything that they wanted, and the league of nations can do nothing to alter any of the unjust clauses of the treaty except by unanimous consent of the members of the league, and the great powers will never give their consent to changes in the interests of weaker peoples." We then talked about the possibility of ratification by the Senate. Mr. Lansing said: "I believe that if the Senate could only under
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97  
98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   >>  



Top keywords:

conversation

 

league

 
Lansing
 

treaty

 

nations

 

BULLITT

 

Secretary

 

objected

 

present

 

matter


clauses

 
CHAIRMAN
 
powers
 

Senate

 
members
 
Shantung
 

information

 

consent

 

Constantinople

 

public


considered

 

dealing

 

discussion

 

committee

 

regard

 

importance

 

immediately

 

dictated

 

international

 
liberty

personal

 

Reading

 
interests
 

unjust

 

unanimous

 
weaker
 

peoples

 
ratification
 

possibility

 
talked

arranged

 

useless

 

simply

 
England
 

France

 

wanted

 
covenant
 

subject

 

enthusiastic

 
stands