FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   >>  
so compound a system, can liquidate the meaning of all the parts, and can adjust them to each other in a harmonious and consistent WHOLE. Such questions, accordingly, have arisen upon the plan proposed by the convention, and particularly concerning the judiciary department. The principal of these respect the situation of the State courts in regard to those causes which are to be submitted to federal jurisdiction. Is this to be exclusive, or are those courts to possess a concurrent jurisdiction? If the latter, in what relation will they stand to the national tribunals? These are inquiries which we meet with in the mouths of men of sense, and which are certainly entitled to attention. The principles established in a former paper(1) teach us that the States will retain all pre-existing authorities which may not be exclusively delegated to the federal head; and that this exclusive delegation can only exist in one of three cases: where an exclusive authority is, in express terms, granted to the Union; or where a particular authority is granted to the Union, and the exercise of a like authority is prohibited to the States; or where an authority is granted to the Union, with which a similar authority in the States would be utterly incompatible. Though these principles may not apply with the same force to the judiciary as to the legislative power, yet I am inclined to think that they are, in the main, just with respect to the former, as well as the latter. And under this impression, I shall lay it down as a rule, that the State courts will retain the jurisdiction they now have, unless it appears to be taken away in one of the enumerated modes. The only thing in the proposed Constitution, which wears the appearance of confining the causes of federal cognizance to the federal courts, is contained in this passage: "THE JUDICIAL POWER of the United States shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress shall from time to time ordain and establish." This might either be construed to signify, that the supreme and subordinate courts of the Union should alone have the power of deciding those causes to which their authority is to extend; or simply to denote, that the organs of the national judiciary should be one Supreme Court, and as many subordinate courts as Congress should think proper to appoint; or in other words, that the United States should exercise the judicial power with which they are t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   >>  



Top keywords:

courts

 

authority

 

States

 
federal
 

judiciary

 

jurisdiction

 

exclusive

 

granted

 

retain

 
principles

United

 
Supreme
 
national
 

exercise

 
proposed
 

subordinate

 

Congress

 

respect

 
appears
 
legislative

impression

 
inclined
 

vested

 

deciding

 
supreme
 

signify

 

construed

 
extend
 

simply

 

judicial


appoint

 

proper

 

denote

 

organs

 

establish

 

appearance

 

confining

 

cognizance

 

Constitution

 

enumerated


contained

 

passage

 
inferior
 

ordain

 

JUDICIAL

 

delegated

 

department

 
principal
 

situation

 

convention