FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
h it out, but no amount of fetching out ever relieves him. That is a national delusion. Our enlightened public is much troubled with such scorpions. Sanitary writers are infested with them. They also say, That in one-half of London people drink Thames water; and in the other half, get water from the Chadwell spring and River Lea. That the River Lea, for twenty miles, flows through a densely-peopled district. and is, in its passage, drenched with refuse matter from the population on its banks. That there is added to Thames water the waste of two hundred and twenty cities, towns, and villages; and that between Richmond and Waterloo-bridge more than two hundred sewers discharge into it their fetid matter. That the washing to and fro of tide secures the arrival of a large portion of filth from below Westminster, at Hammersmith; effects a perfect mixture, which is still farther facilitated by the splashing of the steamboats. Mr. Hassal has published engravings of the microscopic aspect of water taken from companies which suck the river up at widely-separated stages of its course through town--so tested, one drop differs little from another in the degree of its impurity. They tell us that two companies--the Lambeth and West Middlesex--supply Thames Mixture to subscribers as it comes to them; but that others filter more or less. They say that filtering can expurge nothing but mechanical impurities, while the dissolved pollution which no filter can extract is that part which communicates disease. We know this; well, and what then? There are absurdities so lifted above ridicule, that Momus himself would spoil part of the fun if he attempted to trangress beyond a naked statement of them. What do the members of this Water Party want? I'll tell you what I verily believe they are insane enough to look for. They would, if possible, forsake Thames water, calling it dirty, saying it is hard. So hard they say it is, that it requires three spoonfuls of tea instead of two in every man's pot, two pounds of soap for one in every man's kitchen. So they would fetch soft water from a Gathering Ground in Surrey, adopting an example set in Lancashire; from rain-fall on the heaths between Bagshot and Farnham, and from tributaries of the River Wey, they would collect water in covered reservoirs, and bring it by A COVERED AQUEDUCT to London. In London, they would totally abolish cisterns, and all intermittence of supply. Water in London they woul
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Thames

 

London

 

companies

 

twenty

 

matter

 

hundred

 

filter

 

supply

 

statement

 
attempted

trangress

 
members
 
pollution
 

dissolved

 
extract
 

communicates

 

disease

 

impurities

 
filtering
 

expurge


mechanical

 

ridicule

 

lifted

 
absurdities
 
Farnham
 

Bagshot

 

tributaries

 

collect

 

heaths

 

Lancashire


covered

 
reservoirs
 

cisterns

 

abolish

 

intermittence

 

totally

 

COVERED

 

AQUEDUCT

 
adopting
 

calling


forsake
 
requires
 

verily

 

insane

 

spoonfuls

 

Gathering

 

Ground

 
Surrey
 

kitchen

 
pounds