FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339  
340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   >>   >|  
In the first edition the 'ignorant preacher' was a 'wretched little curate.' A rougher but more graphic phrase.] [Footnote 145: There is here a discussion as to the relations between 'justice' and 'utility' upon which Fitzjames agreed with Mill. I dissent from both, and think that Fitzjames would have been more consistent had he agreed with me. I cannot, however, here try to unravel a rather knotty point.] [Footnote 146: P. 232.] [Footnote 147: P. 334.] [Footnote 148: P. 125.] [Footnote 149: P. 69.] [Footnote 150: P. 370.] [Footnote 151: P. 294.] [Footnote 152: P. 300.] [Footnote 153: P. 288.] [Footnote 154: P. 300.] [Footnote 155: I repeat that I do not ask whether his interpretation be correct.] [Footnote 156: Pp. 49-60.] [Footnote 157: P. 302.] [Footnote 158: P. 287.] [Footnote 159: P. 132.] [Footnote 160: P. 75.] [Footnote 161: P. 295.] [Footnote 162: P. 343.] [Footnote 163: P. 354.] [Footnote 164: Bain's _J. S. Mill_, p. 111.] [Footnote 165: _Digest of Law of Evidence_, preface.] [Footnote 166: I have to thank Mr. A. H. Millar, of Dundee, for some papers and recollections referring to this election.] [Footnote 167: They were substantially republished in the _Contemporary Review_ for December 1873 and January 1874.] [Footnote 168: See prefaces to _History of the Criminal Law_ and to the _Digest of the Criminal Law_.] [Footnote 169: The introduction is dated April 1877.] [Footnote 170: Preface to _History of Criminal Law_.] [Footnote 171: 'Jenkins _v._ Cook,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division, i. 80-107.] [Footnote 172: 'Clifton v. Ridsdale,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division, i. 316-367; and ii. 276-353.] [Footnote 173: 'Hughes v. Edwards,' _Law Reports_, Probate Division, ii. 361-371.] [Footnote 174: B. November 8, 1831. d. November 24, 1891.] [Footnote 175: Some account of the reports of these Commissions is given in the _History of Criminal Law_, ii. 45-58, 65-72. The Fugitive Slave Commission was appointed in consequence of a case in which the commander of an English ship in a Mohammedan port was summoned to give up a slave who had gone on board. A paper laid before the Committee by Fitzjames is reprinted in the first passage cited. He thinks that international law prescribes the surrender of the slave; and that we should not try to evade this 'revolting' consequence by a fiction as to the 'exterritoriality' of a ship of war, which might lea
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339  
340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

Criminal

 

Fitzjames

 
Division
 

Probate

 
Reports
 

History

 

consequence

 

Digest

 
agreed

November

 

Clifton

 

Ridsdale

 

Edwards

 

Hughes

 

Preface

 

prefaces

 
January
 
Review
 
December

introduction

 

Jenkins

 
Fugitive
 

passage

 

reprinted

 

thinks

 

Committee

 
international
 

exterritoriality

 

fiction


revolting

 

prescribes

 

surrender

 

Commissions

 

reports

 

account

 

Contemporary

 
Mohammedan
 

English

 
summoned

commander

 

Commission

 

appointed

 

knotty

 

unravel

 

consistent

 

rougher

 

curate

 

graphic

 

phrase