FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>  
the view expressed by the English Government with reference to the conditions under which flour and other foodstuffs might become contraband of war, nor in the doctrine of continuous voyages as applied by Great Britain to trading with the enemy. It was preferred at Washington to follow the usual rule and avoid passing upon hypothetical cases until occasion had called them into actual existence. The problem which had been before the Department of State was, not to force Great Britain to declare herself finally upon broad questions of international law, nor to express the final attitude of the United States upon questions which were not immediately at issue, but to meet the demands of American shippers and secure their immediate interests by some equitable agreement with Great Britain. The arrangement agreed upon, therefore, met only the necessity of the case immediately in view. The United States Consul-General at Cape Town was to arrange with Sir Alfred Milner, the British High Commissioner in South Africa, for the release or purchase by the British Government of any goods owned by citizens of the United States, which, if purchased, were to be paid for at the price they would have brought at the port of destination at the time they would have arrived there had the voyage not been interrupted. Against certain articles, especially the oil consigned to the Netherlands South African Railway, an allegation of enemy's property was justly made and the oil confiscated. In the end most of the American claims were withdrawn or paid in full. In the former event the American owners threw the burden of proof of ownership upon the consignees, who were instructed to present their claims through their respective governments. But it should be noted that in acceding to the American demands by purchasing the goods, the British Government emphasized the fact that the act was purely _ex gratia_ on the part of England. The British representative clearly stated that the goods had been legally detained and that it was open for the owners to come and take them upon proof of ownership before the prize court. It was pointed out that the fact that none but British ships ran between Cape Colony and Delagoa Bay, although an unfortunate circumstance, was one which could hardly be held to be a fault of the English Government. The enforcement of the English law was the right of Great Britain no matter upon whom the inconvenience might happen to fall.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   >>  



Top keywords:

British

 

Government

 

American

 

Britain

 

States

 

United

 

English

 

demands

 

questions

 

immediately


ownership

 

owners

 

claims

 

respective

 

present

 

instructed

 

consignees

 

governments

 
purchasing
 

emphasized


acceding

 
voyages
 

trading

 

burden

 

property

 

justly

 

allegation

 

Washington

 

Netherlands

 
African

Railway
 

confiscated

 

doctrine

 

continuous

 
withdrawn
 
preferred
 
purely
 

circumstance

 
unfortunate
 

Delagoa


inconvenience

 

happen

 

matter

 

enforcement

 

Colony

 

stated

 

legally

 

detained

 

representative

 

England