FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  
surrection. Do children die so often and so good in your parts? The topic taken from the consideration that they are snatched away from _possible vanities_ seems hardly sound; for to an Omniscient eye their conditional failings must be one with their actual. But I am too unwell for theology. Such as I am, I am yours and A.K.'s truly, C. LAMB. [1] "Barton's volume of Poems." LXXXIX. TO BERNARD BARTON. _August_ 10, 1825. We shall be soon again at Colebrooke. Dear B.B.,--You must excuse my not writing before, when I tell you we are on a visit at Enfield, where I do not feel it natural to sit down to a letter. It is at all times an exertion. I had rather talk with you and Anne Knight quietly at Colebrooke Lodge over the matter of your last. You mistake me when you express misgivings about my relishing a series of Scriptural poems. I wrote confusedly; what I meant to say was, that one or two consolatory poems on deaths would have had a more condensed effect than many. Scriptural, devotional topics, admit of infinite variety. So far from poetry tiring me because religious, I can read, and I say it seriously, the homely old version of the Psalms in our Prayer-books for an hour or two together sometimes, without sense of weariness. I did not express myself clearly about what I think a false topic, insisted on so frequently in consolatory addresses on the death of infants. I know something like it is in Scripture, but I think humanly spoken. It is a natural thought, a sweet fallacy, to the survivors, but still a fallacy. If it stands on the doctrine of this being a probationary state, it is liable to this dilemma. Omniscience, to whom possibility must be clear as act, must know of the child what it would hereafter turn out: if good, then the topic is false to say it is secured from falling into future wilfulness, vice, etc. If bad, I do not see how its exemption from certain future overt acts by being snatched away at all tells in its favor. You stop the arm of a murderer, or arrest the finger of a pickpurse; but is not the guilt incurred as much by the intent as if never so much acted? Why children are hurried off, and old reprobates of a hundred left, whose trial humanly we may think was complete at fifty, is among the obscurities of providence, The very notion of a state of probation has darkness in it. The All-knower has no need of satisfying his eyes by seeing what we will do, when he knows be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194  
195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   >>  



Top keywords:

consolatory

 

natural

 

express

 
Scriptural
 

Colebrooke

 
future
 

snatched

 

humanly

 

children

 
fallacy

possibility

 

insisted

 

weariness

 

thought

 

spoken

 

liable

 

survivors

 
stands
 
probationary
 
dilemma

Scripture

 

doctrine

 
addresses
 

Omniscience

 

infants

 

frequently

 

complete

 
obscurities
 

providence

 

reprobates


hundred

 

notion

 

probation

 

satisfying

 

darkness

 

knower

 

hurried

 
exemption
 

falling

 
secured

wilfulness

 

incurred

 

intent

 

pickpurse

 

finger

 

murderer

 

arrest

 

LXXXIX

 

BERNARD

 

BARTON