FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   >>  
ontraire." [12] I Mariae, sess. 2, cap. 2. Gibson, p. 304. [13] And even this with some freedom. See Machyn's Diary, April 6 and 7, 1559. Jewel wrote to Peter Martyr on April 14: "Itaque factum est ut multis iam in locis missae etiam invitis edictis sua sponte ceciderint." _Zurich Letters_, ep. vi. [14] Venetian State Papers, vol. vii. p. 57. Easter Day fell on March 26 that year. The particulars reported by _il Schifanoya_ are interesting. On the morrow of St. George's Day, he reports again, mass for the dead was said for the chapter of the Garter in the usual manner, but the Epistle and Gospel were said in English. _Ibid_., p. 74. [15] _Zurich Letters_., ep. xii. [16] See Caldwell, _Conferences_, pp. 19-21, and 47-54, 2nd ed. [17] S.P. Dom. Eliz., vol. vii. no. 46. See below, p. 26, and Appendix. [18] So all authors; I can find no evidence of the date. [19] Nor was it so annexed in fact. Cardwell is here in error (_Conferences_, p. 30), and his mistake has been generally followed. If there were any doubt on the subject, it would be dispelled by the fact that in 1661 the House of Commons sought the Book annexed to the Act, not of 1559, but of 1552. See below, p. 21. [20] See the Bishop of Chester's speech against the Bill, in Cardwell, _Conferences_, p. 116: "Marke, my lordes, this short discourse, I beseech your lordshippes, and yee shall perceave, that all catholike princes, heryticke princes, yea, and infidells, have from tyme to tyme refused to take that upon them, that your lordshippes go about and chalenge to do." Collier, vol. ii. p. 430, conjectures that the rubric about kneeling at Communion was omitted by the committee of revisers, and restored while the Bill was passing through Parliament; but there is no evidence on either point. The letter of Guest, to which he refers, probably belongs to an early stage of the revision, and contemplates other and more striking variations from the Book as finally revised. See especially the paragraphs in Cardwell, _Conferences_, p. 51. [21] See Clay, _Liturgies, etc., of Queen Elizabeth_, pp. xii. seqq. [22] Clarendon, _History_, vol. iii. p. 747, 8vo, ed. 1707. [23] Ibid., p. 771. [24] Cardwell, _Conferences_, p. 295. The Address of the Ministers, the King's Declaration of October 25, and the Letters Patent of March 25, are given by Cardwell in full, pp. 277-302. [25] Cardwell, _Synod_., pp. 640-642. [26] _Ibid_., pp. 651-660. [27] _Commo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   >>  



Top keywords:
Cardwell
 
Conferences
 

Letters

 

annexed

 

evidence

 

Zurich

 

princes

 

lordshippes

 

Collier

 
committee

revisers
 

restored

 

omitted

 

Communion

 

conjectures

 
rubric
 

kneeling

 

refused

 
lordes
 

discourse


beseech

 

Bishop

 

Chester

 

speech

 
chalenge
 

infidells

 

perceave

 

catholike

 

heryticke

 

Ministers


Address
 
Clarendon
 
History
 

Declaration

 

Patent

 
October
 

Elizabeth

 

refers

 

belongs

 
passing

Parliament

 
letter
 

revision

 

contemplates

 

paragraphs

 
Liturgies
 
revised
 
finally
 

striking

 
variations