FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   >>  
now any one that has written on the Case of Witchcraft with more Judgment and Clearness of Understanding: He has these Words,[47] "If a Man being dangerously sick and like to die upon suspicion, will take it on his death, that such an one has bewitched him, it is an allegation which may move the Judge to examine the Party, but it is of no moment for Conviction." The like is asserted by [48]Mr. _Cooper_, Mr. _Bernard_, (once a famous Minister at _Batcomb_ in _Somerset_) his Book called _A Guide to Grand Jury-men in Cases of Witchcraft_, is a solid and wise Treatise. What his Judgment was in the Case now under debate, we may see, _pag._ 209, 210. where his Words are these; "An Apparation of the Party suspected, whom the Afflicted in their Fits seem to see, is a great suspicion; yet this is but a presumption, tho' a strong one, because these Apparitions are wrought by the Devil, who can represent to the Phansie such as the Parties use to fear, in which his representation he may well lye as in his other Witness: For if the Devil can represent to the Witch a seeming _Samuel_, saying, I see Gods ascending out of the Earth, to beguile _Saul_, may we not think he can represent a common ordinary Person, Man or Woman unregenerate, tho' no Witch to the Phansie of vain Persons, to deceive them and others that will give Credit to the Devil." Thus Mr. _Bernard_. As for the Judgment of the Elders in _New-England_, so far as I can learn, they do generally concur with Mr. _Perkins_, and Mr. _Bernard_. This I know, that at a Meeting of Ministers at _Cambridge_, _August 1. 1692._ where were present seven elders besides the President of the _Colledge_, the Question then discoursed on, was, _Whether the Devil may not sometimes have a Permission to represent an innocent Person as tormenting such as are under Diabolical Molestations?_ The Answer which they all concurred in, was in these words, _viz._ _That the Devil may sometimes have a Permission to represent an innocent Person as tormenting such as are under Diabolical Molestations; but that such things are rare and extraordinary, especially when such Matters come before Civil Judicatures:_ And that some of the most eminent Ministers in the Land, who were not at that Meeting are of the same Judgment, I am assured: And I am also sure, that in Cases of this nature the _Priest's Lips should keep Knowledge, and they should seek the Law at his Mouth_, _Mal. 2.7._ Arg. 6. _Our own Experienc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195  
196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   >>  



Top keywords:
represent
 

Judgment

 

Bernard

 

Person

 

Meeting

 

Ministers

 

innocent

 

Phansie

 

Molestations

 

Permission


tormenting
 

Diabolical

 
Witchcraft
 

suspicion

 

Elders

 

elders

 

President

 

Credit

 

concur

 

generally


August

 
Colledge
 

Cambridge

 

Perkins

 
present
 

England

 

Knowledge

 
Priest
 

nature

 

assured


Experienc

 

eminent

 

things

 

concurred

 

discoursed

 

Whether

 

Answer

 

extraordinary

 

Judicatures

 
deceive

Matters

 
Question
 
Minister
 

Batcomb

 

Somerset

 

famous

 

Conviction

 

asserted

 

Cooper

 

called