FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  
s, what will she not do when she is older, and has to deal with Ministers whom she does not care for, or whom she dislikes? December 14th, 1839 {p.248} I was at Oatlands a fortnight ago, where I met Croker--not overbearing, and rather agreeable, though without having said much that was peculiarly interesting. Two things struck me. He said he dined and passed the evening _tete-a-tete_ with the Duke of Wellington (then Sir Arthur Wellesley) before his departure for Portugal to take the command of the army. He was then Irish Secretary, and had committed to Croker's management the bills he had to carry through Parliament. After dinner he was very thoughtful, and did not speak. Croker said, 'Sir Arthur, you don't talk; what is it you are thinking about?' He said, 'Of the French. I have never seen them; they have beaten all Europe. I think I shall beat them, but I can't help thinking about them.' Another _tete-a-tete_ he had with the Duke was at the time of the Reform Bill, when he went down with him for a week to Strathfieldsaye, during which time he was more low-spirited and silent than Croker said he ever saw him before or since. He reproached himself for what he had done, particularly about Catholic Emancipation, the repeal of the Test Act, and his resignation in '30. Very curious this, not alluding among the topics of self-reproach to his persevering and mischievous opposition to the Emancipation, which he at length conceded in a manner so fraught with future evil, however inevitable; nor to his famous Anti-reform declaration, which, though containing little if anything that was untrue, was so imprudent that its effects were enormous and irretrievable. Such is the blindness, the obstinate reluctance to the admission of error, which besets even the wisest and the best men; for if the Duke of Wellington could have divested his mind of prejudice, and reflected calmly on the past, or looked over the political map of bygone events with the practical sagacity he usually displayed, he never could have failed to perceive the true causes of them. People often take to themselves unmerited blame, to screen themselves from that which they are conscious they deserve. [Page Head: THE MAYOR OF NEWPORT AT COURT.] On Monday last I went to Windsor for a Council. There we had Sir Thomas Phillips, the Mayor of Newport, who came to be knighted. They were going to knight him, and then dismiss him, but I persuaded Normanby that
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264  
265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Croker

 

thinking

 
Emancipation
 

Wellington

 

Arthur

 

divested

 

prejudice

 
wisest
 

reluctance

 

admission


besets

 

obstinate

 

future

 

inevitable

 

fraught

 
manner
 

mischievous

 
persevering
 

opposition

 

length


conceded

 

famous

 

effects

 
imprudent
 

enormous

 

irretrievable

 
untrue
 

reform

 
declaration
 

blindness


perceive
 
Windsor
 
Council
 
Monday
 

NEWPORT

 

Thomas

 

Phillips

 

knight

 

dismiss

 

persuaded


Normanby

 
knighted
 

Newport

 

events

 

bygone

 

practical

 

sagacity

 
political
 
calmly
 

looked