FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   >>  
cannot possibly fall but from the Aire that is very low. And therefore may hold giving sweetnesse of the herbs and flowers, as a distilled water," &c.--Bacon's _Sylva_, by Rawley, 6th ed. 1651, p. 176. JARLTZBERG. _Tradesmen's Signs._--A CITIZEN wishes to be informed in what year or reign the signs that used to hang over the tradesmen's shop-doors were abolished, and whether it was accomplished by "act of parliament," or only "by the authority of the Lord Mayor." Also, whether there is any law now in existence that prevents the tradesmen putting the signs up again, if they were so disposed. * * * * * Minor Queries Answered. _Supporters borne by Commoners._--Can any of your readers state why some commoners bear supporters, and whether the representatives of Bannerets are entitled to do so? I find in Burke's _Dictionary of Landed Gentry_, that several gentlemen in England, Scotland, and Ireland continue to use them. See Fulford, p. 452.; Wyse, p. 1661.; Hay-Newton, p. 552., &c. &c. The late Mr. Portman, father of Lord Portman, used supporters, as do Sir W. Carew, Bart., and some other baronets. GUINEGATE. [Baronets are not entitled, _as such_, to bear supporters, which are the privilege of the peerage and the knights of the orders. There are many baronets who by virtue of especial warrants from the sovereign have, as acts of grace and favour, in consideration of services rendered to the state, received such grants; and in these instances they are limited to descend with the dignity only. No doubt there are some private families who assume and improperly bear supporters, but whose right to do so, even under their own statements as to origin and descent, has no legal foundation. "NOTES AND QUERIES" afford neither space nor place for the discussion of such questions, or for the remarks upon a correction of statements in the works quoted.] _Answer to Fisher's Relation._--I have a work published at London by Adam Islip, an. 1620, the title-page of which bears-- "An Answere to Mr. Fisher's Relation of a Third {225} Conference betweene a certaine B. (as he stiles him) and himselfe. The conference was very private till Mr. Fisher spread certaine papers of it, which in many respects deserved an Answere. Which is here given by R. B., Chapleine to the B. that was employed in the conference." Pray, wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   >>  



Top keywords:
supporters
 

Fisher

 

Relation

 

private

 
tradesmen
 

entitled

 
statements
 

baronets

 
conference
 
Portman

Answere

 

certaine

 

origin

 

improperly

 

instances

 
favour
 
consideration
 

services

 

sovereign

 
warrants

orders

 

virtue

 

especial

 

rendered

 

received

 

dignity

 

families

 

descend

 
grants
 
descent

limited

 
assume
 

betweene

 

stiles

 

himselfe

 

Conference

 

spread

 
Chapleine
 

employed

 
papers

respects

 

deserved

 

afford

 
QUERIES
 
foundation
 

discussion

 

questions

 

published

 

London

 

Answer