FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  
ef even in 1877.[282] Though Barry had held in 1839 that the egg-nucleus does not disappear in segmentation, J. Mueller seems to have been the first actually to prove that it forms by division the nuclei of the first two segmentation spheres. He furnished the demonstration in the egg of _Entoconcha mirabilis_,[283] and his paper was known to Remak, who could not, however, observe a similar division of the egg-nucleus in the frog. Mueller's discovery was confirmed for _Oceania armata_ by Gegenbaur,[284] and for _Notommata sieboldii_ by Leydig.[285] In 1854 Virchow,[286] previously a supporter of Schwann, crystallised the new views in the famous phrase--_Omnis cellula e cellula_--and gave wide publicity to them in his classical lectures on Cellular Pathology, delivered in 1858.[287] The new doctrine of cell-formation was also taught by Leydig[7] in his text-book of histology, published in 1857. The Schleiden-Schwann theory of the origin of cells by generation in a cytoblastem was now definitely overthrown. The importance of the protoplasmic content of the cell was brought into prominence through the work of Dujardin,[289] Purkinje,[290] Cohen[291] and Max Schultze.[292] The last-named in 1861 proposed a definition of the cell which might be accepted at the present day. "A cell," he wrote, "is a little blob of protoplasm containing a nucleus" (p. 11). [238] _Theoria generationis_, Halae, 1759. [239] See J. v. Sachs, _Geschichte der Botanik_, book ii., Eng. Trans., 2nd impr., 1906. [240] Mueller's _Archiv_, pp. 137-76, 1838. [241] _Trans. Linnean Soc._, xvi., p. 710, 1833. [242] _Myxinoiden_, i. Theil., p. 89, 1835. [243] _Ann. Sci. nat._ (2) (_Zool._) ii., pp. 107-18, pl. 11, 1834. [244] _Proc. Phil. Soc. Glasgow_, xix., pp. 71-125, 1887-8. [245] _Traite sur le venin de la vipere_, 1781. [246] Mueller's _Archiv_, 1836. [247] J. Mueller, _Jahresbericht ue. d. Fortschritte der anat.-physiol. Wissenschaften im Jahre_ 1838. Mueller's _Archiv_, 1838. [248] _Symbolae ad anatomiam villorum imprimis eorum epithelii_, Berlin, 1837. [249] _U. d. Ausbreitung des Epitheliums im menschlichen Koerper_. Mueller's _Archiv_, 1838. [250] See Schwann's _Bemerkungen_ at the end of his _Mikroskopische Untersuchungen_. [251] Republished in Ostwald's _Klassiker der exakten Wissenschaften_, No. 176, Leipzig, 1910. Re
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189  
190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Mueller

 

Archiv

 
nucleus
 

Schwann

 

Wissenschaften

 
Leydig
 

segmentation

 

division

 

cellula

 

Myxinoiden


Geschichte

 

Botanik

 
Theoria
 

generationis

 
Linnean
 
protoplasm
 
Ausbreitung
 

Epitheliums

 

Koerper

 

menschlichen


imprimis

 

villorum

 
epithelii
 

Berlin

 

Bemerkungen

 

exakten

 
Leipzig
 

Klassiker

 

Ostwald

 

Mikroskopische


Untersuchungen

 

Republished

 

anatomiam

 

Traite

 

Glasgow

 

vipere

 

physiol

 
Symbolae
 

Fortschritte

 

Jahresbericht


Schultze

 

confirmed

 
discovery
 
Oceania
 

armata

 

Gegenbaur

 

similar

 
observe
 

Notommata

 

sieboldii