FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  
in the mammalian ovum, and the whole course of segmentation in the ovum of the rabbit from the 2-celled to the morula stage was carefully described and figured by Barry[269] in 1839. C. Vogt[270] in 1842 described segmentation in _Coregonus_ and _Alytes_. The discovery of segmentation in the ovum of birds was not made until 1847, by Bergmann,[271] confirmed independently by Coste[272] in 1850. By 1848 segmentation had been noted in _Hydra_ and various hydroids, in acalephs, in starfish, polyzoa, nematodes, rotifers, leeches, oligochaetes, polychaetes, in most groups of molluscs and arthropods, and in all the vertebrate classes.[273] The process was at first held to be merely one of yolk-division, or _Dotterfurchung_, and its details were by most interpreted in the light of the Schleiden-Schwann theory of cell-formation. The first steps towards a truer conception of the process seem to have been taken by Bergmann, who in 1841[274] called attention to the presence of nuclei in the segmentation-spheres of the frog's egg, and by Bagge in the same year, who observed that division of the nuclei preceded the multiplication of the segmentation spheres.[275] He considered the nuclei to be anucleate cells, and the same view was taken by Koelliker in 1843.[276] Next year, however, in his classical paper on Cephalopod development[277] Koelliker came to the opinion that they were really nuclei. He showed that segmentation was brought about by cell-division, that between "total" and "partial" segmentation there was a difference of degree and not of kind, and that the cells of the body were formed by division of the segmentation spheres. He held, however, that the nuclei multiplied endogenously and not by division. The division of nuclei was observed by Coste in 1846.[278] Leydig in 1848[279] took the necessary step in advance and maintained that the nuclei as well as the cells increased always by division. He was supported by Remak, who in a paper of 1852,[280] and more fully in his monumental _Untersuchungen ueber die Entwickelung der Wirbelthiere_ (Berlin, 1850-55), proved that in the frog's egg at least segmentation was a simple process of cell-division, initiated always by division of the nucleus.[281] One point Remak left undecided--the fate of the _Keimblaeschen_ or egg-nucleus. It was generally held, even so late as the 'fifties, that the egg-nucleus disappeared just before segmentation began--Bischoff clung to this beli
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188  
189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

segmentation

 

division

 
nuclei
 

nucleus

 

process

 
spheres
 

observed

 

Koelliker

 

Bergmann

 

Keimblaeschen


opinion

 

brought

 
partial
 

difference

 
undecided
 
showed
 
classical
 

Bischoff

 

Cephalopod

 

development


degree

 

fifties

 
disappeared
 

generally

 

Berlin

 

supported

 
increased
 

maintained

 

Wirbelthiere

 

Entwickelung


Untersuchungen

 

monumental

 

advance

 

endogenously

 

multiplied

 

formed

 

Leydig

 
proved
 

simple

 

initiated


attention

 

confirmed

 
independently
 
discovery
 

starfish

 

polyzoa

 

nematodes

 
acalephs
 

hydroids

 

Alytes