FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  
ght have presented another occasion for ventilating them.--Yours sincerely, W.T. THISELTON-DYER. * * * * * SIR W.T. THISELTON-DYER TO A.R. WALLACE _The Ferns, Witcombe, Gloucester. July 11, 1909._ Dear Mr. Wallace,-- ... I have just got F. Darwin's "Foundations." He tries to make out that his father could have dispensed with Malthus. But the selection death-rate in a slightly varying large population is _the_ pith of the whole business. The Darwin-Wallace theory is, as you say, "the continuous adjustment of the organic to the inorganic world." It is what mathematicians call "a moving equilibrium." In fact, I have always maintained that it is a mathematical conception. It seemed to me there was a touch of insincerity about the whole celebration,[37] as the younger Cambridge School as a whole do not even begin to understand the theory.... I take it that the reason is, as you pointed out, that none of them are naturalists.--Yours sincerely, W.T. THISELTON-DYER. * * * * * TO DR. ARCHDALL REID _Old Orchard, Broadstone, Dorset. December 28, 1909._ Dear Dr. Archdall Reid,--Many thanks for your very interesting and complimentary letter. I am very glad to hear of your new book, which I doubt not will be very interesting and instructive. The subjects you treat are, however, so very complex, and require so much accurate knowledge of the facts, and so much sound reasoning upon them, that I cannot possibly undertake the labour and thought required before I should feel justified in expressing an opinion upon your treatment of them.... I rejoice to hear that you have exposed the fallacy of the claims of the Mendelians. I have also tried to do so, but I find it quite impossible for me to follow their detailed studies and arguments. It wants a mathematical mind, which I have not. But on the general relation of Mendelism to Evolution I have come to a very definite conclusion. This is, that it has no relation whatever to the evolution of species or higher groups, but is really antagonistic to such evolution! The essential basis of evolution, involving as it does the most minute and all-pervading adaptation to the whole environment, is extreme and ever-present plasticity, as a condition of survival and adaptation. But the essence of Mendelian characters is their rigidity. They are transmitted without variation, and therefore, except by the rare
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91  
92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

evolution

 

THISELTON

 

theory

 
sincerely
 

mathematical

 
interesting
 

relation

 

Darwin

 
Wallace
 
adaptation

essence

 

justified

 
labour
 
thought
 
required
 

expressing

 

treatment

 

exposed

 

fallacy

 
claims

Mendelians

 
condition
 

survival

 

opinion

 

undertake

 

rejoice

 
complex
 
require
 

instructive

 

transmitted


subjects

 

rigidity

 

reasoning

 

Mendelian

 

knowledge

 

characters

 

accurate

 
possibly
 

pervading

 

species


environment
 

variation

 
extreme
 
higher
 
essential
 

involving

 

antagonistic

 
minute
 
groups
 

detailed