reject this dogma, the importance of which they conceal from themselves,
are agreed even without knowing it: all the rest is but accessory, and
thence comes their affinity, of which they know not the cause."--Du Pape,
Discours Preliminaire; Liv. i. ch. 13; Liv. iv. ch. 5. Could we have any
stronger witness to the antagonism between the Papal and Patriarchal or
Episcopal System? Or can any words be spoken more opposed in tone than
these to the writings of Fathers and decrees of ancient Councils? Or are
they who say such things wise defenders of the Church or promoters of
unity?
[142] Lib. viii. 30.
[143] Part i. liv. i. ch. 11.
[144] Mansi, vi. 1006. 1012, quoted by Gieseler.
[145] Lib. v. 18.
[146] Proph. Office, p. 221. Development, p. 10.
[147] Sect. 13. March 28, 681, translated in Landon's Councils.
[148] Bossuet, Def. Cler. Gall. pars ii. lib. xii. cap. 34.
[149] Bellarmin de Pont. Rom. lib. iv. cap. 24, 25.
[150] Bellarmin de Pont. Rom. lib. i. cap. 9.
[151] Def. Cleri. Gall. pars ii. lib. xiii. cap. 11.
[152] Bossuet is very moderate. St. Chrysostom says, (on Acts, Hom. 33,)
"James was Bishop in Jerusalem, and so speaks last;" and presently, "There
was no pride in the Church, but much good order. And see, after Peter, Paul
speaketh, and no one rebukes him: James waits and starts not out of his
place, for _he was entrusted with the government_." What would St.
Chrysostom say to Bellarmine's doctrine?
[153] Ep. S. Innoc.; in Op. S. Aug. tom. ii. 618; see above, p. 59.
[154] Ibid, quoted above, p. 60.
[155] St. Leo. Serm. in Anniver. Assumpt. quoted above.
[156] Ep. 10.
[157] Optat. l. ix. contra Parmen.
[158] Greg. Nyss. T. 2. 746.
[159] Caesar. Arel. Epist. ad Symm.
[160] Quoted above, p. 58.
[161] Cap. xiv. lib. xiii. pars 2.
[162] Bossuet, Def. &c. Pars ii. lib. xiii. cap. 20.
[163] De Rom. Pont. lib. iv. cap. 26.
[164] Developement, p. 28.
[165] Du Pape, liv. ii. ch. 6; and Discourse Preliminaire.
[166] See the account of his death in Bowden's Life.
[167] Dante, Paradiso, xii. 55.
[168] Bellarmine, quoted above.
[169] I owe this observation to a friend who has had great opportunities of
judging about the state of the Russian Church.
[170] "Introduction to Die Zukunft Kirche. The work advocates the
introduction of Episcopacy into the German Church, but not the Apostolical
Episcopacy of the English Church, which M. Bunsen condemns in terms as
st
|