FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  
_C. mesoleucus mearnsi_ Merriam on the one hand, and _Conepatus leuconotus leuconotus_ Lichtenstein and _C. l. texensis_ Merriam on the other hand will be found to intergrade, in which event the name _Conepatus leuconotus_, having page priority over _Conepatus mesoleucus_, will apply to the species. Proof of complete intergradation is not yet available. The one difference between the two that prevents our uniting them as subspecies of one species is the larger size of _C. l. leuconotus_ and _C. l. texensis_. Measurements of the smallest adult male and female available to us of _C. l. texensis_ and of the largest adult male and female of _C. m. mearnsi_ are given below. Where the geographic ranges of the two species approach one another the only taxonomically significant difference detected by us is in size, _C. leuconotus_ being larger than _C. mesoleucus_. Other characters that are useful in separating the two alleged species now are known to vary geographically in a fashion that indicates only subspecific status for the two kinds. For example, three specimens from Laredo, Texas (previously recorded by V. Bailey, N. Amer. Fauna, 25:205, October 24, 1905--Nos. 24839/32237, 24840/32238 and 24842/32245 USBS), bridge the gap in color pattern between _C. l. texensis_ to the east and _C. m. mearnsi_ to the west. _C. l. texensis_ characteristically has the white stripe terminating anteriorly in an obtuse angle, and on the hinder back the area of white is restricted to a narrow line or is wanting. _C. m. mearnsi_ characteristically has the white stripe truncate anteriorly and approximately as broad on the hinder back as on the shoulders. In the specimens from Laredo, the young female, No. 24842, has the white nearly truncate anteriorly (pointed in the other two specimens, adult females). In No. 24839 the area of white on the hinder back is only slightly restricted in width (noticeably restricted but present in the other two specimens). The proof of intergradation, or the lack of it, between the two alleged species, _Conepatus mearnsi_ and _Conepatus leuconotus_, would seem to be profitably sought by obtaining specimens along the Rio Grande in Texas between the Blocker Ranch ("50 miles southeast of Eagle Pass") and Laredo. Measurements illustrating the size difference between the two alleged species are as follows: TABLE 1. Measurements of _Conepatus_ from Texas Column Heading Legend: Col. A: [Male] ad. 186
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   >>  



Top keywords:

leuconotus

 
Conepatus
 

species

 
specimens
 

texensis

 

mearnsi

 

alleged

 

difference

 

female

 

Laredo


hinder

 

anteriorly

 
mesoleucus
 

Measurements

 

restricted

 

characteristically

 
truncate
 

stripe

 
Merriam
 

intergradation


larger
 

Legend

 

obtuse

 

Heading

 

narrow

 

Column

 

terminating

 

pattern

 

Grande

 

bridge


illustrating

 

Blocker

 

wanting

 
present
 
noticeably
 

sought

 

obtaining

 
profitably
 

slightly

 

shoulders


approximately

 

pointed

 

females

 

southeast

 

largest

 
smallest
 

subspecies

 
uniting
 

geographic

 

significant