FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  
h much greater truth be ascribed to the author of _Antony_ and _la Tour de Nesle_. Scribe invents and eludes where Dumas invents and dares. The theory of Scribe is one of mere dexterity: his drama is a perpetual _chasse-croise_ at the edge of a precipice, a dance of puppets among swords that might but will not cut and eggs that might but will not break; to him a situation is a kind of tight-rope to be crossed with ever so much agility and an endless affectation of peril by all his characters in turn: in fact, as M. Dumas _fils_ has said of him, he is 'le Shakespeare des ombres chinoises.' The theory of Dumas is the very antipodes of this. 'All I want,' he said in a memorable comparison between himself and Victor Hugo, 'is four trestles, four boards, two actors, and a passion'; and his good plays are a proof that in this he spoke no more than the truth. Drama to him was so much emotion in action. If he invented a situation he accepted its issues in their entirety, and did his utmost to express from it all the passion it contained. That he fails to reach the highest peaks of emotional effect is no fault of his: to do that something more is needed than a perfect method, something other than a great ambition and an absolute certainty of touch; and Dumas was neither a Shakespeare nor an AEschylus--he was not even an Augier. All the same, he has produced in _la Tour de Nesle_ a romantic play which M. Zola himself pronounces the ideal of the _genre_ and in _Antony_ an achievement in drawing-room tragedy which is out of all questioning the first, and in the opinion of a critic so competent and so keen as the master's son is probably the strongest, thing of its kind in modern literature. On this latter play it were difficult, I think, to bestow too much attention. It is touched, even tainted, with the manner and the affectation of its epoch. But it is admirably imagined and contrived; it is very daring, and it is very new; it deals with the men and women of 1830, and--with due allowance for differences of manners, ideal, and personal genius--it is in its essentials a play in the same sense as _Othello_ and the _Trachiniae_ are plays in theirs. It is the beginning, as I believe, not only of _les Lionnes Pauvres_ but of _Therese Raquin_ and _la Glu_ as well: just as _la Tour de Nesle_ is the beginning of _Patrie_ and _la Haine_. At Least. And if these greater and loftier pretensions be still contested; if the t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
affectation
 

passion

 

Shakespeare

 

theory

 
invents
 
Scribe
 

greater

 
Antony
 

situation

 

beginning


strongest

 

master

 
modern
 

literature

 
pretensions
 
loftier
 

difficult

 

competent

 
critic
 

Othello


pronounces

 

contested

 

Trachiniae

 
romantic
 

Augier

 
produced
 

achievement

 

questioning

 

opinion

 

tragedy


drawing

 

bestow

 
Raquin
 

Therese

 

Pauvres

 

differences

 
manners
 
genius
 

Lionnes

 

allowance


Patrie

 

touched

 

tainted

 

attention

 
essentials
 

manner

 
contrived
 

daring

 
imagined
 

admirably