FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  
339.).--I am much obliged to "SELEUCUS" for his answer to this inquiry, as far as regards the seignory of Gower. It also throws a strong light on the remaining names; by the aid of which, looking in Gloucestershire and Monmouthshire, I have identified _Margore_ with the parish of Magor (St. Mary's), hundred of Caldecott, co. Monmouth: and guess, that for Chepstall we must read _Chepstow_, which is in the same hundred, and the population of which we know was stout in the royal cause, as tenants of the Marquis of Worcester would be. Then I guess Woolaston may be _Woolston_ (hundred of Dewhurst), co. Gloucester; and Chaulton, one of the _Charltons_ in the same county, perhaps _Charlton Kings_, near Cheltenham; where again we read, that many of the residents were slain in the civil war, _fighting on the king's side_. This leaves only Sydenham without something like a probable conjecture, at least: unless here, too, we may guess it was miswritten for Siddington, near Cirencester. The names, it is to be observed, are only recorded by Noble; whose inaccuracy as a transcriber has been shown abundantly by Carlyle. The record to which he refers as extant in the House of Commons papers, is not to be found, I am told. Now, if it could be ascertained, either that the name in question had been Cromwell's, or even that they were a part of the Worcester estates, before the civil war, we should have the whole list cleared,--thanks to the aid so effectually given by "SELEUCUS'S" apposite explanations of one of its items. Will your correspondents complete the illustrations thus well begun? V. Belgravia, March 26. * * * * * MISCELLANIES. _Franz von Sickingen_.--Your correspondent "S.W.S." (No. 21. p. 336.) speaks of his having had some difficulty in finding a portrait of Franz Von Sickingen; it may not therefore, by uninteresting to him to know (if not already aware of it) that upon the north side of the nave of the cathedral of Treves, is a monument of Richard Von Greifenklan, who defended Treves against the said Franz; and upon the entablature are portraits of the said archbishop on the one side, and his enemy Franz on the other. Why placed there it is difficult to conceive, unless to show that death had made the prelate and the robber equals. W.C. * * * * * BODY AND SOUL. (_FROM THE LATIN OF OWEN._) The sacred writers to express the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   >>  



Top keywords:
hundred
 

SELEUCUS

 

Sickingen

 

Worcester

 

Treves

 

MISCELLANIES

 
Belgravia
 
correspondent
 
cleared
 

estates


Cromwell

 

correspondents

 

complete

 
illustrations
 

effectually

 

apposite

 

explanations

 

prelate

 

robber

 

conceive


difficult

 

equals

 

sacred

 

writers

 
express
 

archbishop

 

portrait

 

finding

 
uninteresting
 

difficulty


speaks

 

defended

 
entablature
 

portraits

 
Greifenklan
 

Richard

 

question

 

cathedral

 
monument
 

population


Chepstow
 
Chepstall
 

Caldecott

 

Monmouth

 

tenants

 

Marquis

 
Chaulton
 

Charltons

 

county

 

Gloucester