FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  
,000), because that he had calumniated the good ship _Murillo_, and caused her prejudice and injury by detaining her a couple of months in the waters of Cadiz. The persons who instituted this action forget that the Spanish courts have no jurisdiction in the matter of libels published in England. And as for the prejudice caused to the vessel, it is incredible that the British Government should be so weak as to wait for letters from Lloyd's agent before opening an inquiry into the deaths of some three hundred of its subjects and the identity of the dastardly scoundrel who was the cause of their deaths, who disabled the ship that held them, and then slunk off, leaving them to the mercy of the midnight sea. That the _Murillo_ was that vessel, even those who maintain that she cannot be proved legally guilty do not attempt to deny. It is true, as they say, that moral certainty is one thing, legal certainty another. But there was seldom a clearer chain of circumstantial evidence pointing to the perpetrator of any crime than that which convicted the _Murillo_ of being the misdemeanant. She was off Dungeness at the hour of the disaster, and she was in contact with a ship; this the imprisoned master admitted in his log. But he alleged that the ship could not have been the _Northfleet_. He said he came into collision with a vessel; that he stood by her for half an hour; that one of her boats put off with some persons on board carrying a lantern; that they went round her examining whether there was anything wrong; and that no call having been made to him for assistance he steamed away. But there was a discrepancy between the entry in his log and that in the log of the engineer. The latter, an Englishman, stated that the engines of the _Murillo_ were backed before the collision, that she went astern afterwards, and then went on ahead. The delay altogether was only for a few minutes. No mention of the half-hour. The engineer had no object in telling a lie. The master of the _Murillo_ had. No other ship was in collision off Dungeness that night. Besides, what meant the order to the _Murillo_ to come on at once to Cadiz if she had been in collision, and not stop at Lisbon, whither she was bound as port of call, if not to get her into limits where justice is notoriously blind and halt? Argument is unnecessary and childish; it was the _Murillo_ which cut down the _Northfleet_. But Spain will never exact retribution for the destruction of t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45  
46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Murillo
 

collision

 
vessel
 

certainty

 
deaths
 
master
 
persons
 

engineer

 

Dungeness

 

Northfleet


prejudice

 

caused

 

discrepancy

 

steamed

 

assistance

 

carrying

 

alleged

 

examining

 

lantern

 

Englishman


justice

 

notoriously

 

limits

 

Argument

 
unnecessary
 
retribution
 

destruction

 

childish

 

Lisbon

 

altogether


minutes

 
engines
 
backed
 

astern

 

mention

 

object

 

Besides

 

telling

 

stated

 
opening

inquiry
 
letters
 

hundred

 

disabled

 
scoundrel
 

subjects

 

identity

 

dastardly

 

forget

 
Spanish