FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  
they are adduced, that is, they usually contain the word for which they are quoted, and the context is more or less accurately rendered. But in some cases it is otherwise: Johnson's memory played him false, and he quotes a passage for a word that it does not actually contain. As an example, under _Distilment_ he correctly quotes from _Hamlet_, 'And in the porches of mine ears did pour the leperous distilment.' But when he reached _Instilment_, his memory became vague, and forgetting that he had already quoted the passage under _Distilment_, he quoted it again as 'the leperous instilment'--a reading which does not exist in any text of Shakspere, and was a mere temporary hallucination of memory. There are some other curious mistakes, which must, I suppose, have crept in either in the course of transcription or of printing. As specimens I mention two, because they have unfortunately perverted ordinary usage. The two words _Coco_ and _Cocoa_--the former a Portuguese word[12], naming the _coco-nut_, the fruit of a palm-tree; the latter a latinized form of _Cacao_, the Aztec name of a Central American shrub, whence we have cocoa and chocolate--were always distinguished down to Johnson's time, and were in fact distinguished by Johnson himself in his own writings. His account of these in the Dictionary is quoted from Miller's _Gardener's Dictionary_ and Hill's _Materia Medica_, in which the former is spelt _coco_ and the latter _cacao_ and _cocoa_. But in Johnson's Dictionary the two words are by some accident run together under the heading _cocoa_, with the disastrous result that modern vulgar usage mixes the two up, spells the _coco-nut_, 'cocoa-' as if it were _co-co-a_, and on the other hand pronounces _cocoa_, the cacao-bean and the beverage, as if it were _coco_. The word _dispatch_, from It. _dispaccio_, had been in English use for some 250 years when Johnson's Dictionary appeared, and had been correctly spelt by everybody (that is by everybody but the illiterate) with dis-. This was Johnson's own spelling both before and after he published the dictionary, as may be seen in his _Letters_ edited by Dr. G. Birkbeck Hill[13]. It was also the spelling of all the writers whom Johnson quoted. But by some inexplicable error, the word got into the dictionary as _despatch_, and this spelling was even substituted in most of the quotations. I have not found that a single writer followed this erroneous spelling in the eighteenth cen
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  



Top keywords:

Johnson

 

quoted

 

spelling

 

Dictionary

 
memory
 

dictionary

 

distinguished

 

quotes

 

leperous

 

Distilment


correctly
 

passage

 
vulgar
 
modern
 

quotations

 

pronounces

 
substituted
 

result

 
spells
 
heading

Miller

 

Gardener

 

erroneous

 

eighteenth

 
account
 
Materia
 

accident

 

single

 

Medica

 

writer


disastrous

 
beverage
 

inexplicable

 

published

 

Letters

 
edited
 

Birkbeck

 

despatch

 
English
 

dispaccio


writers

 

dispatch

 

illiterate

 
writings
 

appeared

 

instilment

 

reading

 

forgetting

 

curious

 

mistakes