FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
it.' "My answer was in the following terms:-- [Sidenote: Airy's scepticism.] NO. 2.--G. B. AIRY _to the_ REV. T. J. HUSSEY. [_Extract._] "'OBSERVATORY, CAMBRIDGE, _1834, Nov. 23_. "'I have often thought of the irregularity of _Uranus_, and since the receipt of your letter have looked more carefully to it. It is a puzzling subject, but I give it as my opinion, without hesitation, that it is not yet in such a state as to give the smallest hope of making out the nature of any external action on the planet ... if it were certain that there were any extraneous action, I doubt much the possibility of determining the place of a planet which produced it. I am sure it could not be done till the nature of the irregularity was well determined from several successive revolutions.'" [Sidenote: Le Verrier's papers.] [Sidenote: Planet to be detected by disc.] [Sidenote: Galle's discovery of the planet.] Although only a sentence or two have been selected from Airy's reply (he was not yet Astronomer Royal), they are sufficient to show that the problem of finding the place of such a possible disturbing body was regarded at that time as one of extreme difficulty; and no one appears seriously to have contemplated embarking upon its solution. It was not until many years later that the solution was attempted. Of the first attempt we shall speak presently, putting it aside for the moment because it had no actual bearing on the discovery of the planet, for reasons which form an extraordinary episode of this history. The attempt which led to success dates from November 1845. The great French astronomer Le Verrier, on November 10, 1845, read to the French Academy a paper on the Orbit of Uranus, considering specially the disturbances produced by Jupiter and Saturn, and showing clearly that with no possible orbit could the observations be satisfied. On June 1, 1846, followed a second paper by the same author, in which he considers all the possible explanations of the discordance, and concludes that none is admissible except that of a disturbing planet exterior to Uranus. And assuming, in accordance with Bode's Law, that the distance of this new planet from the sun would be about double that of Uranus (and it is important to note this assumption), he proceeds to investigate the orbit of such a planet, and to calculate the place where it must be looked for in
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

planet

 

Uranus

 
Sidenote
 

Verrier

 

produced

 

nature

 

action

 

discovery

 

disturbing

 

French


November
 

solution

 

attempt

 

looked

 

irregularity

 

CAMBRIDGE

 

success

 

history

 

astronomer

 

specially


disturbances

 

Academy

 

episode

 

extraordinary

 

presently

 

putting

 

receipt

 

attempted

 

answer

 
reasons

bearing

 
actual
 

moment

 

Jupiter

 

Saturn

 

accordance

 

distance

 

assuming

 

admissible

 

exterior


calculate

 

assumption

 

proceeds

 

important

 

double

 

concludes

 

observations

 
satisfied
 

thought

 

showing