FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142  
143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>  
adley's method, without endangering its elegant simplicity and effectiveness by attempts at improvement, other than supplying certain means of instrumental control which would without doubt commend themselves to his sagacious mind. [Sidenote: Other puzzles explained.] "In the next article Bradley's later observations at Greenwich, the results of which are not so distinct, will be discussed; and also those of Brinkley at Dublin, 1808-13 and 1818-22. This will bring again to the surface one of the most interesting episodes in astronomical history, the spirited and almost acrimonious dispute between Brinkley and Pond with regard to stellar parallaxes. I hope to show that the hitherto unsolved enigma of Brinkley's singular results finds its easy solution in the fact of the polar motion. The period of his epoch appears to have been about a year, and its range more than a second. Afterwards will follow various discussions already more or less advanced towards completion. These include Bessel's observations at Koenigsberg, 1820-24, with the Reichenbach circle, and in 1842-44 with the Repsold circle; the latitudes derived from the polar-point determinations of Struve and Maedler with the Dorpat circle, 1822-38; Struve's observations for the determination of the aberration; Peters' observations of _Polaris_, 1841-43, with the vertical-circle; the results obtained from the reflex zenith-tube at Greenwich, 1837-75, whose singular anomalies can be referred in large part to our present phenomenon, complicated with instrumental error, to which until now they have been exclusively attributed; the Greenwich transit-circle results, 1851-65, in which case, however, a similar complication and the large accidental errors of observation seem to frustrate efforts to get any pertinent results; the Berlin prime-vertical observations of Weyer and Bruennow, 1845-46, in which I hope to show that the parallax of [beta] _Draconis_ derived from them is simply a record of the change of latitude; the conflicting latitude determinations at Cambridge, England; the Washington observation of _Polaris_ and other close Polars, 1866-87, with the transit-circle; also those at Melbourne, 1863-84, a portion of which have already been drawn upon in the last number of the _Journal_, and so
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142  
143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   >>  



Top keywords:

circle

 

results

 

observations

 

Brinkley

 

Greenwich

 

Struve

 

observation

 

singular

 

transit

 

determinations


latitude

 

derived

 

instrumental

 

vertical

 

Polaris

 

Peters

 

aberration

 

present

 
Dorpat
 

determination


reflex

 
complicated
 

phenomenon

 

obtained

 

latitudes

 

zenith

 

Maedler

 

referred

 

anomalies

 
Repsold

errors
 

Cambridge

 

conflicting

 

England

 
Washington
 
change
 
record
 

Draconis

 
simply
 

Polars


number

 

Journal

 

portion

 

Melbourne

 

parallax

 

similar

 

complication

 

accidental

 

exclusively

 

attributed