FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
he offenses which must come, "woe to that man (or nation) by whom the offense cometh!" They are of one mind in regarding this present war as a great crime--perhaps the greatest crime--against civilization, and the only questions which invite discussion are: Which of the two contending groups of Powers is morally responsible? Was Austria justified in declaring war against Servia? Was Germany justified in declaring war against Russia and France? Was Germany justified in declaring war against Belgium? Was England justified in declaring war against Germany? Primarily and perhaps exclusively these ethical questions turn upon the issues developed by the communications which passed between the various chancelleries of Europe in the last week of July, for it is the amazing feature of this greatest of wars that it was precipitated by the ruling classes and, assuming that all the diplomats sincerely desired a peaceful solution of the questions raised by the Austrian ultimatum (which is by no means clear) the war is the result of ineffective diplomacy. I quite appreciate the distinction between the immediate causes of a war and the anterior or underlying causes. The fundamental cause of the Franco-German War of 1870 was not the incident at Ems nor even the question of the Spanish succession. These were but the precipitating pretexts or, as a lawyer would express it, the "proximate causes." The underlying cause was unquestionably the rivalry between Prussia and France for political supremacy in Europe. Behind the Austrian ultimatum to Servia were also great questions of State policy, not easily determinable upon any tangible ethical principle, and which involved the hegemony of Europe. Germany's domination of Europe had been established when by the rattling of its saber it compelled Russia in 1908 to permit Austria to disturb the then existing status in the Balkans by the forcible annexation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, and behind the Austrian-Servian question of 1914, arising out of the murder of the Crown Prince of Austria at Serajevo, was the determination of Germany and Austria to reassert that dominant position by compelling Russia to submit to a further humiliation of a Slav State. The present problem is to inquire how far Germany and her ally selected a just pretext to test this question of mastery. The pretext was the work of diplomatists. It was not the case of a nation r
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Germany
 

Austria

 

questions

 

Europe

 
justified
 
declaring
 

question

 
Austrian
 

Russia

 

ethical


ultimatum

 

France

 
Servia
 

underlying

 
present
 
pretext
 

nation

 

greatest

 
domination
 

compelled


hegemony

 

established

 

involved

 
rattling
 

Behind

 
proximate
 

unquestionably

 

rivalry

 

express

 

precipitating


pretexts

 

lawyer

 
Prussia
 

political

 

determinable

 

tangible

 
easily
 
policy
 

supremacy

 

principle


problem

 

inquire

 

humiliation

 

compelling

 
submit
 

diplomatists

 
mastery
 

selected

 
position
 

dominant