FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  
is a choice: but whatever choice we make, we make it at our peril. If a man chooses to turn his back altogether on God and the future, no one can prevent him; no one can show beyond reasonable doubt that he is mistaken. If a man thinks otherwise and acts as he thinks, I do not see that any one can prove that _he_ is mistaken. Each must act as he thinks best; and if he is wrong, so much the worse for him. We stand on a mountain pass in the midst of whirling snow and blinding mist, through which we get glimpses now and then of paths which may be deceptive. If we stand still we shall be frozen to death. If we take the wrong road we shall be dashed to pieces. We do not certainly know whether there is any right one. What must we do? 'Be strong and of a good courage.' Act for the best, hope for the best, and take what comes.... If death ends all, we cannot meet death better."[5] [1] An Address to the Philosophical Clubs of Yale and Brown Universities. Published in the New World, June, 1896. [2] Compare the admirable page 310 in S. H. Hodgson's "Time and Space," London, 1865. [3] Compare Wilfrid Ward's Essay, "The Wish to Believe," in his _Witnesses to the Unseen_, Macmillan & Co., 1893. [4] Since belief is measured by action, he who forbids us to believe religion to be true, necessarily also forbids us to act as we should if we did believe it to be true. The whole defence of religious faith hinges upon action. If the action required or inspired by the religious hypothesis is in no way different from that dictated by the naturalistic hypothesis, then religious faith is a pure superfluity, better pruned away, and controversy about its legitimacy is a piece of idle trifling, unworthy of serious minds. I myself believe, of course, that the religious hypothesis gives to the world an expression which specifically determines our reactions, and makes them in a large part unlike what they might be on a purely naturalistic scheme of belief. [5] Liberty, Equality, Fraternity, p. 353, 2d edition. London, 1874. {32} IS LIFE WORTH LIVING?[1] When Mr. Mallock's book with this title appeared some fifteen years ago, the jocose answer that "it depends on the _liver_" had great currency in the newspapers. The answer which I propose to give to-night cannot be jocose. In the words of one of Shakespeare's prologues,-- "I come no more to make you laugh; things now, That bear a weighty and a seriou
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53  
54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

religious

 

thinks

 
hypothesis
 

action

 

answer

 

jocose

 

choice

 

London

 

Compare

 

naturalistic


mistaken
 

belief

 

forbids

 

unworthy

 

trifling

 

specifically

 

determines

 

expression

 

reactions

 

legitimacy


required

 

dictated

 

inspired

 

superfluity

 

pruned

 

defence

 

controversy

 

hinges

 

edition

 
currency

newspapers

 
propose
 

fifteen

 

depends

 

things

 

weighty

 

seriou

 

Shakespeare

 

prologues

 

appeared


Fraternity

 

Equality

 

Liberty

 

scheme

 

unlike

 

purely

 

Mallock

 
LIVING
 

glimpses

 

deceptive