FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  
in Warfield, H. St. G. Tucker. Executive Committee. W.H. Mann, John B. Clark, J.M. Dickinson, Austen G. Fox, Henry C. Morris, Leo S. Rowe, Oscar S. Straus, Thomas R. White, Hamilton Holt, Theodore Marburg, W.B. Howland, John H. Hammond, W.H. Short, A.L. Lowell, John A. Stewart, William H. Taft. German-American Dissent By Hugo Muensterberg. The subjoined letter from Hugo Muensterberg, Professor of Psychology at Harvard University, is addressed to Augustus J. Cadwalader, Secretary of the National Provisional Committee for the League to Enforce Peace. Clifton, Mass., June 9, 1915. Dear Sir: I beg to express my thanks for the courtesy of the invitation to attend the conference of the League of Peace in Independence Hall under the Presidency of the Hon. W.H. Taft. I feel myself, of course, in deepest sympathy with the spirit of justice and peacefulness which has suggested the foundation of such a league. Nevertheless, I beg to be excused from attendance, as I am convinced that this time of international excitement and prejudice is unfit for the crystallization of new forms for the common life of the nations. I venture, however, to add that I feel in any case grave doubts of the value of any plans which aim to secure future peace by the traditional type of agreements and treaties. We live in the midst of a war in which one belligerent nation after another has felt obliged to disregard treaties and to interpret agreements in a one sided way. Only yesterday Italy, without any reason of vital necessity, annulled an agreement and a treaty which had appeared the firmest in European politics, and which yet failed in the first hour of clashing interests. A psychologist has no right to expect that the national temper of the future will be different. Moreover, the Supreme Court of the United States has sanctioned the idea, which is shared practically by all nations, that treaties are no longer binding when a situation has changed so that the fulfillment of the agreement would be against the vital interests of the nation. We have learned during the last ten months how easily such disburdening changes can be discovered as soon as the national passions are awakened. The new plan depends upon only one new feature by which the mutual agreement is to be fortified against the demands of national excitement. The plan of the League of Peace promises the joint use of military fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114  
115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

League

 

national

 

agreement

 
treaties
 

nations

 
Muensterberg
 

interests

 

future

 
Committee
 
excitement

agreements

 

nation

 
belligerent
 
annulled
 
European
 

necessity

 

traditional

 

secure

 

treaty

 
appeared

firmest

 
military
 

interpret

 

obliged

 

politics

 

disregard

 
yesterday
 
reason
 

months

 

easily


learned

 

changed

 

fulfillment

 

disburdening

 

feature

 

mutual

 

fortified

 
depends
 

awakened

 

discovered


passions
 

situation

 
temper
 
Moreover
 
expect
 

psychologist

 

failed

 
clashing
 
Supreme
 

promises