FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   >>   >|  
al deposits on the basis of origin is more or less arbitrary. The sharp lines implied by the use of class names do not exist in nature. Mineral deposits are so complex and so interrelated in origin, that a classification according to genesis indicates only the essential and central class features; it does not sharply define the limits of the classes. It is practically impossible for any geologist to present a classification which will be accepted without qualification by other geologists, although there may be agreement on essential features. Difficulties in reaching agreement are increased by the inheritance from the past of names, definitions, and classifications which do not exactly fit present conceptions based on fuller information,--but which, nevertheless, have become so firmly established in the literature that it is difficult to avoid their use. In the progress of investigation many new names are coined to fit more precisely the particular situation in hand, but only in fortunate cases do these new names stand up against the traditional currency and authority of old names. The geologist is often in despair in his attempt to express his ideas clearly and precisely, and at the same time to use terms which will be understandable by his readers and will not arouse needless controversy. As illustrative of the above remarks reference may be made to a few terms commonly used in economic geology, such as _primary_, _secondary_, _syngenetic_, _epigenetic_, _supergene_, _hypogene_, _protore_, etc. The most commonly used of these terms are _primary_ and _secondary_. It is almost impossible to define them in a way which will cover all the conceptions for which they have been used, and yet in their context they have been very useful in conveying essential ideas. An ore formed by direct processes of sedimentation has sometimes been called primary, whereas an ore formed by later enrichment of these sediments has been called secondary. An ore formed directly by igneous processes has been called primary, while an ore formed by enrichment of such primary ore by later processes has been called secondary. It is clear, however, that these terms are merely relative, with application to a specific sequence, and that they do not fix the absolute position of the ore in a sequence applying to all ores. For instance, ores deposited directly as sediments or placers may be derived from the erosion of preexisting ore bodies,--in which
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64  
65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

primary

 

secondary

 

called

 
formed
 

essential

 

processes

 

agreement

 
commonly
 

directly

 

enrichment


conceptions

 

precisely

 

sediments

 

features

 

sequence

 

present

 

classification

 

deposits

 
origin
 

define


geologist

 
impossible
 

epigenetic

 
needless
 

syngenetic

 

deposited

 
placers
 
reference
 

supergene

 

instance


protore
 
hypogene
 

derived

 

erosion

 
illustrative
 

preexisting

 

bodies

 
controversy
 

geology

 

economic


remarks

 

relative

 

sedimentation

 
application
 

direct

 

igneous

 
arouse
 
specific
 
applying
 

position