FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  
s; and hence mining laws relating to ownership are not of great age, although historical precedent may be traced far back. ON ALIENATED LANDS Where lands came into private ownership, or were "alienated" from the governments before the formulation of mining laws, varied procedures have been followed in different countries. In England and the United States, under the old regime in Russia, and to a slight extent in other parts of the world, mineral titles remain with the owner of the land and the government does not exercise the right of eminent domain. But even in England, where private property rights have been held peculiarly sacred, the discovery of oil during the later years of the war led to an attempt to expropriate the oil rights for the government. Because of the objection of landowners this attempt has not reached the statute books, but the movement is today an extremely live political question in England. A somewhat similar question is involved also in the movement to nationalize the coal resources of England, now being so vigorously urged by the labor party. In the United States, no serious attempt has yet been made to take over mineral resources from private ownership. Other countries have gone farther in retroactive measures in regard to alienated lands. Under the leadership of France, most of the countries of western Europe have appropriated to their governments the undiscovered mineral resources on private ground, particularly those beneath the surface, except where previously they had been specifically conveyed to the private owners, or with the exception of certain designated areas and minerals which had been conveyed to private ownership prior to certain dates. Some minerals occurring at the surface, variously specified and defined in different countries, are allowed to remain with the private owners, although often subject to government regulation in regard to their development and use. In varying degree this treatment of mineral resources on alienated lands is followed in the British colonial laws--in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada--and in the Latin-American laws. The laws are usually based on specified classifications of minerals. Those occurring at or near the surface, and called "quarries," "placer deposits," "non-mines," or "surface deposits," usually remain with the surface owners. Those beneath the surface, called "sub-surface deposits" or "mines," in general belong
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

surface

 

private

 

England

 

mineral

 

ownership

 

countries

 

resources

 

alienated

 

attempt

 
minerals

deposits

 
owners
 
remain
 

government

 
rights
 

mining

 

question

 

regard

 
movement
 

beneath


States

 

conveyed

 

occurring

 
governments
 
United
 

called

 

ground

 

relating

 

previously

 

quarries


placer

 
undiscovered
 

farther

 

retroactive

 

measures

 

belong

 

general

 

western

 
Europe
 

appropriated


France
 
leadership
 

specifically

 

exception

 

degree

 

treatment

 

British

 
varying
 

regulation

 
development