FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  
ad the reviews of books in the old _Spectators_ and _Athenaeums_, and put in the words they say there about other people's books. We said we thought that chapter about Geraldine and the garters was "subtle" and "masterly" and "inevitable"--that it had an "old-world charm," and was "redolent of the soil." We said, too, that we had "read it with breathless interest from cover to cover," and that it had "poignant pathos and a convincing realism," and the "fine flower of delicate sentiment," besides much other rot that the author can't remember. When all the letters were done we addressed them and stamped them and licked them down, and then we got different people to post them. Our under-gardener, who lives in Greenwich, and the other under-gardener, who lives in Lewisham, and the servants on their evenings out, which they spend in distant spots like Plaistow and Grove Park--each had a letter to post. The piano-tuner was a great catch--he lived in Highgate; and the electric-bell man was Lambeth. So we got rid of all the letters, and watched the post for a reply. We watched for a week, but no answer came. You think, perhaps, that we were duffers to watch for a reply when we had signed all the letters with fancy names like Daisy Dolman, Everard St. Maur, and Sir Cholmondely Marjoribanks, and put fancy addresses on them, like Chatsworth House, Loampit Vale, and The Bungalow, Eaton Square. But we were not such idiots as you think, dear reader, and you are not so extra clever as you think, either. We had written _one_ letter (it had the grandest _Spectator_ words in it) on our own letter-paper, with the address on the top and the uncle's coat-of-arms outside the envelope. Oswald's real own name was signed to this letter, and this was the one we looked for the answer to. See? But that answer did not come. And when three long days had passed away we all felt most awfully stale about it. Knowing the great good we had done for Albert's uncle made our interior feelings very little better, if at all. And on the fourth day Oswald spoke up and said what was in everybody's inside heart. He said-- "This is futile rot. I vote we write and ask that editor why he doesn't answer letters." "He wouldn't answer that one any more than he did the other," said Noel. "Why should he? He knows you can't do anything to him for not." "Why shouldn't we go and ask him?" H.O. said. "He couldn't not answer us if we was all there, staring him
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110  
111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

answer

 

letter

 

letters

 
signed
 
gardener
 

watched

 

Oswald

 

people

 
shouldn
 

staring


envelope
 

looked

 

address

 

written

 

reader

 

grandest

 

clever

 

Spectator

 
couldn
 

idiots


editor

 

fourth

 

futile

 

inside

 

feelings

 

interior

 

passed

 

wouldn

 

Albert

 

Knowing


sentiment

 

author

 
delicate
 

flower

 

pathos

 

convincing

 

realism

 
remember
 
Greenwich
 

Lewisham


servants

 
addressed
 

stamped

 

licked

 
poignant
 
chapter
 

Geraldine

 

garters

 

subtle

 

thought