FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>  
tives on the jury the people of the district have concluded to live in a condition of timid subjection to a band of assassins settled among them. And not only they, but the great national railway, which passes through their district, felt called upon, on behalf of the same lawless crew, to heap abuse and obloquy upon, and finally to dismiss one of its own officers for busying himself with the enforcement of law against them. We should be greatly cheered to think that this jury which betrayed the public safety committed to it by law, was exceptional, and that the district could yet be roused to vindicate law and order." In all these articles it is assumed that the reason of the jurymen not agreeing on a verdict of guilty was their personal fear of the liquor men. There is another possible aspect of the case which is not touched upon by these papers, viz., that the jurors may have been friends of the liquor party, and their disagreement may have been intended not to secure their own safety, but to shield the hotel keepers from such punishment as must follow a decision of guilty on the part of the jury. We quote here some of the communications mentioned above, which were sent to the editor of the _Witness_ regarding the settlement of the assault case. The letter given below, signed "Justice," was written from Sweetsburg under date of March 12th, 1895: "SIR,--The Smith assault case is concluded, but the people are not done talking about it, by any means; and for some time to come the privilege of free speech will be exercised on that case. The judge in his charge to the jury on Thursday said: 'No intelligent and right-minded jury can fail to bring in a verdict in accordance with the testimony.' The evidence for the prosecution proved unmistakably the guilt of the prisoners, while the testimony for the defence was evidently manufactured for the occasion. "The prisoners on Monday pleaded guilty to common assault. If Howarth, Jenne, Wilson and Kelly were guilty of anything, they were guilty of more than common assault, if ever there was a deliberate and well-planned scheme for 'doing up' any person, that plan was made in this instance, and the nail was clinched when Howarth, at Richford, paid to Kelly the fifteen dollars earnest money, which was to be followed later by the hundred and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   >>  



Top keywords:
guilty
 

assault

 

district

 

Howarth

 
common
 

testimony

 
liquor
 

prisoners

 
verdict
 
safety

concluded

 

people

 

earnest

 

speech

 

privilege

 
fifteen
 
Thursday
 

charge

 

dollars

 
exercised

talking

 

Justice

 

written

 

Sweetsburg

 

signed

 

hundred

 

letter

 

intelligent

 
pleaded
 
scheme

Monday

 
occasion
 

manufactured

 

person

 

planned

 

Wilson

 

deliberate

 
evidently
 

accordance

 
Richford

minded

 

evidence

 

prosecution

 
instance
 
defence
 

clinched

 

proved

 

unmistakably

 

officers

 

busying