FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55  
56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   >>   >|  
out that one which is in your judgment most clearly so. MR. BRECKENRIDGE. They are all, in my opinion, so equally atrocious that I dislike to discriminate. I will send the Senator the bill, and I tell him that every section, except the last, in my opinion, violates the Constitution of the United States; and of that last section, I express no opinion. MR. BAKER. I had hoped that that respectful suggestion to the Senator would enable him to point out to me one, in his judgment, most clearly so, for they are not all alike--they are not equally atrocious. MR. BRECKENRIDGE. Very nearly. There are ten of them. The Senator can select which he pleases. MR. BAKER. Let me try then, if I must generalize as the Senator does, to see if I can get the scope and meaning of this bill. It is a bill providing that the President of the United States may declare, by proclamation, in a certain given state of fact, certain territory within the United States to be in a condition of insurrection and war; which proclamation shall be extensively published within the district to which it relates. That is the first proposition. I ask him if that is unconstitutional? That is a plain question. Is it unconstitutional to give power to the President to declare a portion of the territory of the United States in a state of insurrection or rebellion? He will not dare to say it is. MR. BRECKENRIDGE. Mr. President, the Senator from Oregon is a very adroit debater, and he discovers, of course, the great advantage he would have if I were to allow him, occupying the floor, to ask me a series of questions, and then have his own criticisms made on them. When he has closed his speech, if I deem it necessary, I will make some reply. At present, however, I will answer that question. The State of Illinois, I believe, is a military district; the State of Kentucky is a military district. In my judgment, the President has no authority, and, in my judgment, Congress has no right to confer upon the President authority, to declare a State in a condition of insurrection or rebellion. MR. BAKER. In the first place, the bill does not say a word about States. That is the first answer. MR. BRECKENRIDGE. Does not the Senator know, in fact, that those States compose military districts? It might as well have said "States" as to describe what is a State. MR. BAKER. I do; and that is the reason why I suggest to the honorable Senator that this critici
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55  
56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Senator

 

States

 
President
 

United

 

judgment

 

BRECKENRIDGE

 

declare

 

insurrection

 

district

 

military


opinion
 

rebellion

 

authority

 

condition

 

answer

 

unconstitutional

 

territory

 

question

 

proclamation

 

section


atrocious

 

equally

 

occupying

 

advantage

 

criticisms

 

questions

 

present

 

speech

 

closed

 
series

describe

 
compose
 

districts

 

honorable

 

critici

 

suggest

 

reason

 

Kentucky

 

Congress

 

Illinois


confer

 

enable

 

providing

 

suggestion

 

respectful

 

meaning

 

pleases

 
select
 

generalize

 

express