FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  
John Quinn was a dangerous man, for: 1. He was a thief, for: (1) The Illinois state courts found him guilty of robbing a bank, for: a) See _Ill. Court Reports_, Vol. X., p. 83. The brief, then, is a concise, logical outline of everything that the speaker wishes to say to the audience. Its purpose is to indicate in the most definite form every step through which the hearers must be taken in order that the proposition may at last be fully accepted by their experience. The brief is for the debater himself. He does not show it to the audience. It is the framework of his argument. It is the path which, if carefully marked out, will lead to success. Now, as we have seen, there are three principal steps in debating: 1. Making clear what you wish the audience to believe. 2. Showing the audience why the establishing of certain issues should make them believe this. 3. Proving these issues. The first two of these steps constitute what in the brief is called the _Introduction_. The third step, proving the issues, is the largest part of the brief and is called the _Body_ or the _Proof_. In addition to these two divisions of the brief there is a sort of formal summary at the end called the _Conclusion_. The skeleton of a brief then would be as follows: INTRODUCTION In which: (1) the desired end is made clear; (2) the issues are determined. PROOF In which the issues are stated as declarations or assertions and definite reasons are given why each one should be believed. These reasons are in turn supported by other reasons until the assertion is finally brought within the hearers' experience. CONCLUSION In which the proof is summarized. Of course no two briefs are identical, but all must follow this general plan. Suppose we look at what might be called a model brief. MODEL BRIEF Statement of proposition. INTRODUCTION I. Definition of terms. II. Restatement of question in light of these terms. III. Determination of issues. 1. Statement of what both sides admit. 2. Statement of what is irrelevant. IV. Statement of the issues. PROOF I. The first issue is true, for: 1. This reason, which is true, for: (1) This reason, for: a) This reason. b) This reason. 2. This reason, for: (1) This evidence. (2) This authority. (3) This testimony, for: a)
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47  
48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

issues

 

reason

 
audience
 

Statement

 

called

 

reasons

 

proposition

 

hearers

 

INTRODUCTION

 

experience


definite
 

desired

 

declarations

 

assertions

 

stated

 

determined

 

divisions

 

irrelevant

 

summary

 

addition


Conclusion

 

formal

 

authority

 

evidence

 

skeleton

 

testimony

 

supported

 

general

 

Suppose

 
Determination

follow

 
identical
 

question

 

Restatement

 

Definition

 

assertion

 

finally

 

believed

 

brought

 

briefs


CONCLUSION

 

summarized

 

speaker

 

wishes

 

outline

 

concise

 

logical

 
purpose
 

Illinois

 

courts