FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  
, and messages attributed to various men and women suggesting their sexual availability and proficiency. And if the political targets have changed over the years, many of the political attitudes have remained consistent. Graffiti is an irreverent form, with strong popular and anti-establishment elements. As actions common to all classes, eating, drinking, defecation, and fornication find their lowly record in graffiti-like form. [Footnote 3: See, for example, Elizabeth Wales and Barbara Brewer, "Graffiti in the 1970's," _Journal of Social Psychology_ 99 (1976): 115-23.] On the most basic level, a writer will observe that the excrement of the rich differs in no way from that of the poor. Thus one poem, taken supposedly from a "Person of Quality's Boghouse," has the following sentiment: Good Lord! who could think, That such fine Folks should stink? (Pt. 2, p. 25) There is nothing very polite about such observations, and no pretension to art. These verses belong strictly to folklore and the sociology of literature, but they suggest some continuing rumbles of discontent against the class system, the existence among the lower orders of some of the egalitarian attitudes that survived the passing of the Lollards and the Levellers. Who were the writers of these pieces? Were they indeed laborers? Or were they from the lower part of what was called the "middle orders"? Is there some evidence to be found in the very fact that they could write? Graffiti may, indeed, tell us something about degrees of literacy. One wit remarked that whatever the ability to read or write may have been at the time, almost everyone seemed to have been literate when presented with a bog-house wall: "Since all who come to Bog-house write" (pt. 2, p. 26). The traditional connection between defecation and writing was another comparison apparent to the commentators. One wrote: There's Nothing foul that we commit, But what we write, and what we sh - - t. (Pt. 2, p. 13) And the lack of some paper or material to clean the rear end provoked the following sentiment in the form of a litany: From costive Stools, and hide-bound Wit, From Bawdy Rhymes, and Hole besh - - t. From Walls besmear'd with stinking Ordure, By Swine who nee'r provide Bumfodder _Libera Nos_---- (Pt. 4, p. 7) Other
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28  
29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Graffiti

 

defecation

 
sentiment
 

political

 

attitudes

 

orders

 

remarked

 
passing
 

ability

 

Lollards


writers

 

Levellers

 

literacy

 
middle
 
called
 

evidence

 

laborers

 
degrees
 

pieces

 

Rhymes


provoked
 

litany

 
costive
 

Stools

 

besmear

 

Libera

 

Bumfodder

 

provide

 

Ordure

 
stinking

survived

 

traditional

 

connection

 
presented
 

writing

 
material
 
commit
 

apparent

 

comparison

 
commentators

Nothing

 
literate
 
strictly
 

graffiti

 

Footnote

 

record

 

eating

 
classes
 
drinking
 

fornication