FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533  
534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   >>   >|  
s Gaius and Gnaeus by C. and Cn. respectively. On the early inscription discovered in the Roman Forum in 1899 the letter occurs but once, in the form [Illustration] written from right to left. The broad lower end of the symbol is rather an accidental pit in the stone than an attempt at a diacritic mark--the word is _regei_, in all probability the early dative form of _rex_, "king." It is hard to decide why Latin adopted the _g_-symbol with the value of _k_, a letter which it possessed originally but dropped, except in such stereotyped abbreviations as K. for the proper name _Kaeso_ and _Kal._ for _Calendae_. There are at least two possibilities: (1) that in Latium _g_ and _k_ were pronounced almost identically, as, _e.g._, in the German of Wuerttemberg or in the Celtic dialects, the difference consisting only in the greater energy with which the _k_-sound is produced; (2) that the confusion is graphic, K being sometimes written [Illustration] which was then regarded as two separate symbols. A further peculiarity of the use of C in Latin is in the abbreviation for the district _Subura_ in Roma and its adjective _Suburanus_, which appears as SVC. Here C no doubt represents G, but there is no interchange between _g_ and _b_ in Latin. In other dialects of Italy _b_ is found representing an original voiced guttural (_gw_), which, however, is regularly replaced by _v_ in Latin. As the district was full of traders, _Subura_ may very well be an imported word, but the form with C must either go back to a period before the disappearance of _g_ before _v_ or must come from some other Italic dialect. The symbol G was a new coinage in the 3rd century B.C. The pronunciation of C throughout the period of classical Latin was that of an unvoiced guttural stop (_k_). In other dialects, however, it had been palatalized to a sibilant before _i_-sounds some time before the Christian era; _e.g._ in the Umbrian _facia_ = Latin _facial_. In Latin there is no evidence for the interchange of _c_ with a sibilant earlier than the 6th century A.D. in south Italy and the 7th century A.D. in Gaul (Lindsay, _Latin Language_, p. 88). This change has, however, taken place in all Romance languages except Sardinian. In Anglo-Saxon _c_ was adopted to represent the hard stop. After the Norman conquest many English words were re-spelt under Norman influence. Thus Norman-French spelt its palatalized _c_-sound (_=tsh_) with _ch_ as in _cher_ and the English palat
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533  
534   535   536   537   538   539   540   541   542   543   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

symbol

 

dialects

 

century

 

Norman

 
district
 
letter
 

adopted

 

English

 

period

 

sibilant


palatalized

 

Subura

 

written

 

Illustration

 

interchange

 

guttural

 

disappearance

 
coinage
 

voiced

 

dialect


Italic
 
regularly
 

replaced

 

traders

 

French

 

imported

 

Language

 
Lindsay
 

change

 

conquest


represent

 
Sardinian
 

languages

 
Romance
 

unvoiced

 

classical

 
pronunciation
 
sounds
 

facial

 

evidence


original

 

earlier

 

Christian

 

Umbrian

 

influence

 

separate

 
dative
 

probability

 
attempt
 

diacritic