FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270  
1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   >>   >|  
od. In the mean time, gentlemen, I am your friend and well-wisher. HAVERHILL, MASS., 22d 7th Mo., 1833. II. The abolitionists of the North have been grossly misrepresented. In attacking the system of slavery, they have never recommended any measure or measures conflicting with the Constitution of the United States. They have never sought to excite or encourage a spirit of rebellion among the slaves: on the contrary, they would hold any such attempt, by whomsoever made, in utter and stern abhorrence. All the leading abolitionists of my acquaintance are, from principle, opposed to war of all kinds, believing that the benefits of no war whatever can compensate for the sacrifice of one human life by violence. Consequently, they would be the first to deprecate any physical interference with your slave system on the part of the general government. They are, without exception, opposed to any political interposition of the government, in regard to slavery as it exists in the states. For, although they feel and see that the canker of the moral disease is affecting all parts of the confederacy, they believe that the remedy lies with yourselves alone. Any such interference they would consider unlawful and unconstitutional; and the exercise of unconstitutional power, although sanctioned by the majority of a republican government, they believe to be a tyranny as monstrous and as odious as the despotism of a Turkish Sultan. Having made this disclaimer on the part of myself and my friends, let me inquire from whence this charge of advocating the interference of the general government with the sovereign jurisdiction of the states has arisen? Will you, gentlemen, will the able editors of the United States Telegraph and the Columbian Telescope, explain? For myself, I have sought in vain among the writings of our "Northern Enthusiasts," and among the speeches of the Northern statesmen and politicians, for some grounds for the accusation. The doctrine, such as it is, does not belong to us. I think it may be traced home to the South, to Virginia, to her Convention of 1829, to the speech of Ex-President Monroe, on the white basis question. "As to emancipation," said that distinguished son of your state, "if ever that should take place, it cannot be done by the state; it must be done by the Union." Again, "If emancipation can ever be effected, it can only be done with t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270  
1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
government
 

interference

 
opposed
 

Northern

 

emancipation

 

unconstitutional

 

states

 
general
 

slavery

 
United

gentlemen

 
system
 

States

 

abolitionists

 

sought

 

grounds

 

Telescope

 

Columbian

 

Telegraph

 

editors


accusation

 

wisher

 

Enthusiasts

 
speeches
 

politicians

 

statesmen

 

writings

 

explain

 

arisen

 
HAVERHILL

friends

 

disclaimer

 

Turkish

 

Sultan

 

Having

 

inquire

 

doctrine

 

jurisdiction

 

charge

 

advocating


sovereign

 

friend

 
distinguished
 
effected
 

question

 

traced

 

despotism

 

belong

 

Virginia

 
Monroe