FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574  
575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>   >|  
As to the King's service, the Lord Bishop did not mean that it should be rendered at the expense of justice; he was a man of some priestly pride and was not likely to reveal his own evil designs. If he spoke thus, it was because in France, for a century at least, the jurisdiction of the Inquisition had been regarded as the jurisdiction of the King.[2161] And as for the expression "an elaborate prosecution" (_un beau proces_), that meant a trial in which legal forms were observed and irregularities avoided, for it was a case in which were interested the doctors and masters of the realm of France and indeed the whole of Christendom. Messire Guillaume Manchon, well skilled in legal procedure, was not likely to err in a matter of legal language. An elaborate trial was a strictly regular trial. It was said, for example, that "N---- and N---- had by elaborate judicial procedure found such an one to be guilty."[2162] [Footnote 2161: L. Tanon, _Histoire des tribunaux de l'inquisition en France_, pp. 550, 551.] [Footnote 2162: De Beaurepaire, _Recherches sur le proces de condamnation_, p. 320.] Charged by the Bishop to choose another registrar to assist him, Guillaume Manchon selected as his colleague Guillaume Colles, surnamed Boisguillaume, who like him was a notary of the Church.[2163] [Footnote 2163: _Trial_, vol. i, p. 25; vol. iii, p. 137. De Beaurepaire, _Recherches...._ p. 103. A. Sarrazin, _loc. cit._, pp. 222, 223.] Jean Massieu, priest, ecclesiastical dean of Rouen, was appointed usher of the court.[2164] [Footnote 2164: _Trial_, vol. i, p. 26. De Beaurepaire, _Recherches...._ p. 115. A. Sarrazin, _loc. cit._, pp. 223, 224.] In that kind of trial, which was very common in those days, there were strictly only two judges, the Ordinary and the Inquisitor. But it was the custom for the Bishop to summon as councillors and assessors persons learned in both canon and civil law. The number and the rank of those councillors varied according to the case. And it is clear that the obstinate upholder of a very pestilent heresy must needs be more particularly and more ceremoniously tried than an old wife, who had sold herself to some insignificant demon, and whose spells could harm nothing more important than cabbages. For the common wizard, for the multitude of those females, or _mulierculae_, as they were described by one inquisitor who boasted of having burnt many, the judges were content with three or four eccl
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570   571   572   573   574  
575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596   597   598   599   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Footnote
 

Guillaume

 
France
 

elaborate

 
Beaurepaire
 

Recherches

 

Bishop

 
proces
 

judges

 

councillors


Sarrazin
 

Manchon

 

procedure

 

strictly

 

common

 
jurisdiction
 

appointed

 
Inquisitor
 
assessors
 

custom


ecclesiastical

 

priest

 

summon

 

Ordinary

 

Massieu

 

persons

 

cabbages

 

wizard

 

multitude

 

females


important
 

spells

 

mulierculae

 
content
 

inquisitor

 

boasted

 

insignificant

 

varied

 
number
 
obstinate

upholder

 

ceremoniously

 
pestilent
 

heresy

 

learned

 

prosecution

 

expression

 

Inquisition

 

regarded

 

observed