FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>  
stical--which appear in the present paper, will amply repay the closest scrutiny. These hands are unwontedly realistic, and emphasize their distinctiveness in every vein and wrinkle. They appear to be themselves endowed with each of those various qualities which caused their possessor to be regarded as one of the most puissant figures in the century's literature. The hand is not one, to use Charles Lamb's expressive phrase, to be looked at _standing on one leg_. It deserves a keener examination. [Illustration: THOMAS CARLYLE'S HANDS.] Mention has been made of the hand of a distinguished prelate, Cardinal Manning. It will not be out of place to compare it with the hands of the late Archbishop of Canterbury, which were cast posthumously. Scarcely anything could be more antagonistic. The nervous personality of Manning is wanting here. The hands of the Archbishop seem more to belong to the order of the benevolent Bishop Myriel than to that of the enthusiast and ascetic. [Illustration: THE LATE ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY'S HANDS.] [Illustration: LORD PALMERSTON'S HAND.] Plenty of opportunity to study the hands of statesmen is afforded in those of Lord Palmerston, Count Cavour, Sir Stratford Canning, and Lord Melbourne. The fallacy of attaching special qualities to any distinctive trait in the hand of an eminent person is most readily discernible here. One should avoid _a posteriori_ reasoning. It would be the same for a physiognomist to argue a man a statesman from a facial resemblance to Mr. Gladstone, or that he is fit to write tragedies because he owns the exact facial proportions of Sardou. [Illustration: COUNT CAVOUR'S HANDS.] [Illustration: SIR STRATFORD CANNING'S HANDS.] Among these the hand of Lord Palmerston will stand forth most prominently to the reader. Its characteristics are, on the whole, sufficiently obvious, in the appended cast, to be thought accentuated. It might not unprofitably be noted in connection with those of Stratford Canning, Viscount de Redcliffe (for fifty years British Ambassador in India), whose statue by Boehm, with Tennyson's famous epitaph: Thou third great Canning, stand among our best And noblest, now thy long day's work hath ceased, Here, silent in our Minster of the West, Who wert the voice of England in the East! is in a nave of the Abbey. With these should be joined the hand of Viscount Melbourne, the predecessor of Sir Robert Peel in the Premi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108  
109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>  



Top keywords:

Illustration

 
Canning
 
Viscount
 

facial

 
Palmerston
 
Melbourne
 
qualities
 

Manning

 

Archbishop

 

Stratford


STRATFORD
 

sufficiently

 

CANNING

 

prominently

 
characteristics
 
reader
 

Gladstone

 

obvious

 

resemblance

 
physiognomist

statesman
 

proportions

 

Sardou

 

tragedies

 
reasoning
 

posteriori

 

CAVOUR

 
British
 

ceased

 
silent

Minster
 

noblest

 

predecessor

 

joined

 

Robert

 
England
 

Redcliffe

 

discernible

 

connection

 
thought

accentuated

 

unprofitably

 

Ambassador

 

epitaph

 
famous
 

Tennyson

 

statue

 
appended
 

opportunity

 

phrase