FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>  
y said of husbands, 'Better a poor one far, than none at all!' A thought ignoble, and which no true woman Should harbor for a moment. Give her freedom, Freedom to seek, and she'll not harbor it! Because if woman, equally with man, Were privileged thus, she would discriminate Much more than now, and fewer sordid unions Would be the sure result. For what if man Were chained to singleness until some woman Might seek his hand in marriage, would he be Likely as now to make a wise election? Would he not say, 'Time flies; my chances lessen And I must plainly take what I can get?' True, there are mercenary men enough, Seeking rich dowries; they'd find fewer dupes, Were women free as men to seek and choose, Banish the senseless inequality, And you make marriage less a vulgar game In which one tries to circumvent the other. Oh! all this morbid ribaldry of _men_, And all this passive imbecility, And superstitious inactivity, Dissimulation and improvidence, False shame and lazy prejudice of _women_, Where the great miracle of sex concerns us, And Candor should be innocently wise, And Knowledge should be reverently free,-- Is against nature,[9]--helps to hide the way Out of the social horrors that confound us, And launches thousands into paths impure, Shutting them out from holy parentage." "I hold," said Charles, "the question is not one Of reasoning, but of simple sentiment. As it would shock me, should a woman speak In virile baritone, so would I shudder To hear a grave proposal marriageward In alto or soprano." "'Twould depend! Depend on love," said Linda; "love potential, Or present."--"Nay, 'twould frighten love!" cried Charles,-- "Kill it outright."--"Then would it not be love! What! would you love a woman less because She durst avow her love, before the cue Had been imparted by your lordly lips? Rare love would that be truly which could freeze Because the truth came candid from her heart, And in advance of the proprieties!" "But may the woman I could love," cried Charles, "Forbear at least the rash experiment!" "I doubt," said Linda, "if you know your heart; For hearts look to the substance, not the form. Why should not woman seek her happiness With brow as unabashed as man may wear In seeking his? Ah! lack of candor here Works more regrets, for woman and for man,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90  
91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   >>  



Top keywords:

Charles

 
marriage
 
Because
 

harbor

 
Twould
 
soprano
 
Depend
 

potential

 

thousands

 

impure


marriageward
 
Shutting
 

depend

 
simple
 
reasoning
 

virile

 
sentiment
 

baritone

 

proposal

 

question


shudder

 

parentage

 

hearts

 

substance

 

experiment

 

proprieties

 

Forbear

 
happiness
 
candor
 

regrets


seeking

 

unabashed

 
advance
 

candid

 

outright

 

twould

 

frighten

 

freeze

 

launches

 
lordly

imparted

 

present

 

Likely

 

election

 
result
 

chained

 

singleness

 

plainly

 

chances

 

lessen