arsenic, whose constitution was thoroughly
broken up by it. Again, an amateur of long standing called on me some
time since, paralyzed in one hand--the doctors could make nothing of
him. I said at once, "You have been using quantities of arsenic, and
probably dry?"
Much astonished, he said "Yes;" and he had never mentioned this fact
to his numerous doctors, who worked, of course, in the dark, when, by
a course of antidotes taken at first, he might have been saved.
Used alone, arsenical paste is worse than useless for animals, causing
them to "sweat" at once in certain places, and preventing your pulling
them about, as you must do if modelling; again, if used for fur, you
seldom or never can relax by that crucial test of a good preservative,
i.e,--plunging in water.
Yet one question to the advocates of arsenic. If it possesses the
chief advantage claimed for it, why use camphor in museums under the
idea that it drives away moths?
Perhaps it will be as well to point out secundum artem the pros and
cons for the use of arsenic.
ARSENICAL PASTE.
Advantages claimed. Disadvantages.
A perfect dryer of Will often "sweat" skins, especially
animal tissue. those of mammals, for which it is useless.
Keeps all things free Is not of the slightest use for
from attack of insects. this purpose.
Easier to make and use Denied.
than any other preparation.
Gives off poisonous fumes
when hot.
Deposits metallic
arsenic when drying.
Gives off poisonous dust
when thoroughly dry.
Causes colds, coughs, etc,
which turn to bronchitis,
paralysis, etc.
Having now summed up in the case of Common Sense versus Arsenic, I
challenge contradiction to any of my statements, and ask, Why use a
dangerous and inefficient preservative agent, when a harmless
preservative, and that quite as good worker and dryer as arsenic, will
suffice? I have invented a soap for which I claim those advantages,
and as to its deterrent principle re insects, I am convinced that it
is quite as good as the other, for is there any one thing
known--compatible with clean-looking work--that will prevent the
ravages of the maggots in birds' skins? I answer, No!--if we except
one thing, too dangerous to handle--bichloride of mercury, of which
anon. Let me whisper a little fact, and blow the poison theory to the
winds: The real secret of success is
|