FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   >>   >|  
arsenic, whose constitution was thoroughly broken up by it. Again, an amateur of long standing called on me some time since, paralyzed in one hand--the doctors could make nothing of him. I said at once, "You have been using quantities of arsenic, and probably dry?" Much astonished, he said "Yes;" and he had never mentioned this fact to his numerous doctors, who worked, of course, in the dark, when, by a course of antidotes taken at first, he might have been saved. Used alone, arsenical paste is worse than useless for animals, causing them to "sweat" at once in certain places, and preventing your pulling them about, as you must do if modelling; again, if used for fur, you seldom or never can relax by that crucial test of a good preservative, i.e,--plunging in water. Yet one question to the advocates of arsenic. If it possesses the chief advantage claimed for it, why use camphor in museums under the idea that it drives away moths? Perhaps it will be as well to point out secundum artem the pros and cons for the use of arsenic. ARSENICAL PASTE. Advantages claimed. Disadvantages. A perfect dryer of Will often "sweat" skins, especially animal tissue. those of mammals, for which it is useless. Keeps all things free Is not of the slightest use for from attack of insects. this purpose. Easier to make and use Denied. than any other preparation. Gives off poisonous fumes when hot. Deposits metallic arsenic when drying. Gives off poisonous dust when thoroughly dry. Causes colds, coughs, etc, which turn to bronchitis, paralysis, etc. Having now summed up in the case of Common Sense versus Arsenic, I challenge contradiction to any of my statements, and ask, Why use a dangerous and inefficient preservative agent, when a harmless preservative, and that quite as good worker and dryer as arsenic, will suffice? I have invented a soap for which I claim those advantages, and as to its deterrent principle re insects, I am convinced that it is quite as good as the other, for is there any one thing known--compatible with clean-looking work--that will prevent the ravages of the maggots in birds' skins? I answer, No!--if we except one thing, too dangerous to handle--bichloride of mercury, of which anon. Let me whisper a little fact, and blow the poison theory to the winds: The real secret of success is
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81  
82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

arsenic

 

preservative

 

useless

 
claimed
 
poisonous
 

dangerous

 

insects

 
doctors
 

Deposits

 

drying


metallic

 

success

 

Causes

 
paralysis
 

Having

 

bronchitis

 

poison

 
coughs
 

preparation

 
things

whisper

 
tissue
 

mammals

 

slightest

 
Denied
 

handle

 

bichloride

 

Easier

 

attack

 

mercury


purpose

 

deterrent

 

principle

 

advantages

 
suffice
 

animal

 
invented
 
compatible
 
prevent
 

ravages


convinced

 

maggots

 

challenge

 
contradiction
 

theory

 

Arsenic

 

versus

 
summed
 

Common

 
statements